Monday, 10 February 2025

Time Machines In Transit

Why are time machines invisible in transit? Are they always?

(i) HG Wells' Time Traveller tells his dinner guests that his Time Machine moves too fast to be seen but it doesn't move anywhere. It remains stationary on the Earth's surface in a state of time dilation so it should resemble a statue. The "Time Traveller" does not travel anywhere or when. In The Space Machine, his sequel to The Time Machine and The War Of The Worlds, Christopher Priest explains that the Time Machine in transit is attenuated.

(ii) Doctor Who's TARDIS disappears into and re-emerges from the "time vortex" where, according to the villainous Master, E = MCcubed.

(iii) Poul Anderson's Time Patrol timecycles do not exist between departure and arrival. They disappear from one set of spatiotemporal coordinates and (re)appear at another.

When a timecycle appears/arrives, it might have disappeared/departed from:

same place, earlier time;
same place, later time;
different place, earlier time;
different place, later time;
same place, prevented future;
different place, prevented future -

- but it cannot arrive from a prevented past.

15 comments:

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Paul!

Ugh!!! More brain hurting complications! (Smiles)

Ad astra! Sean

S.M. Stirling said...

For one thing, having the time machine be invisible really makes plotting easier.

paulshackley2017@gmail.com said...

That is the reason for it.

S.M. Stirling said...

Of course, in "reality" that would depend on the nature of the time-travel mechanism. If it's instantaneous, like teleportation, then "invisibility" is natural. You don't see people teleport, they're just "here" and then "there".

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Mr. Stirling!

I have a vague recollection of reading somewhere that some people think teleportation is possible. One of those "psi" powers?

Ad astra! Sean

paulshackley2017@gmail.com said...

A very great deal depends on the mechanism of time travel.

S.M. Stirling said...

Paul: oh, completely. For example, in one of Poul's novels, you travel in a "physical" tunnel that literally bores through time.

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, to Both!

THE CORRIDORS OF TIME, perhaps now one of Anderson's more obscure novels.

Ad astra! Sean

paulshackley2017@gmail.com said...

And that is one in which the characters do literally travel along time.

S.M. Stirling said...

I found THE CORRIDORS OF TIME a gripping story.

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Mr. Stirling!

I like CORRIDORS too! And I liked Brann a lot better than I did Storm Darroway.

Ad astra! Sean

paulshackley2017@gmail.com said...

While I was reading CORRIDORS, when I was at University, I began to to think that Lockridge had joined the wrong side. Of course we came to see that neither side was right.

S.M. Stirling said...

Paul: yeah, Storm's people were more superficially attractive, until you investigated more deeply -- which was why the people from the far future dumped Lockridge where they did!

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Paul!

Of course there was much that was wrong in the cause Brann served, but he was still a better person than Storm, who reminds me a lot of Stirling's Draka.

Ad astra! Sean

paulshackley2017@gmail.com said...

Brann personally better than Storm. Agreed.