Tuesday, 21 July 2026

Apep And Hell

Brendan Doyle, now William Ashbless, looks down the throat of the serpent Apep:

"...when it opened its vast jaws he thought he could see negative stars shining in a remote distance, as if Apep's mouth was the gateway to a universe of absolute cold and the absence of light."
-The Anubis Gates, 15, p. 452.

See Poul Anderson's Hell in:




Powers: negative stars; absolute cold; absence of light.

Anderson: full entropy.

Here and now: full night; Good Night!

SF And Fantasy

(Today we travelled not around Morecambe Bay by train but up the Lune Valley to Ruskin's View by bus.) 

SF
Empirically discerned natural laws operate invariably.

By applying natural laws, intelligent beings construct technology with which to control natural forces, e.g., using steam to move engines, radio waves to send messages, electricity to light and heat buildings, nuclear reactions to generate energy etc.

Gravity control, instantaneous communication, faster than light space travel etc must result from future technology, not from any contravention of natural laws.

Any other intelligences are extraterrestrial.

Fantasy
Some conscious beings (gods, angels, demons, magicians) control natural forces by acts of will, sometimes expressed by spells or incantations, but without needing technology. Thus, objects are moved, messages are sent, light and energy are generated etc "magically" and not technologically. Natural laws are not utilized but suspended by acts of will.

Other intelligences are supernatural.

Some Authors

Poul Anderson wrote both kinds of fiction well.

CS Lewis freaks us out when, in the opening chapter of Perelandra, he suggests that, on Mars, Ransom had met beings that were both extraterrestrial and supernatural.

Authors can create sf/fantasy mixes, e.g., Tim Power's zones where machines do not work but magic does.

Comment
We live in the world described by sf, not by fantasy.

Diversity And Entropy

Continuing to reread Tim Powers' The Anubis Gates, we find that this novel is mostly neither sf in general nor time travel in particular but fantasy. Gods exist. Magic works. To become the nineteenth century poet, William Ashbless, whose photograph he has seen, Brendan Doyle must not only time travel but also switch bodies by means of a magic potion. Of course, Powers' fantasy, like his time travel, parallels works by Poul Anderson although a completely different set of works by Anderson. The latter writer's distinguishing features include his vast output, his consistent combination of quality with quantity and his comprehensiveness. Whereas many other authors specialize in hard sf, alternative histories, fantasy, historical fiction or detective fiction, Anderson wrote all of these although some more than others.

It is unthinkable that time travel would intrude in a heroic fantasy like The Broken Sword or that magic would work in the Time Patrol series although characters from the different kinds of universes can meet in the Old Phoenix Inn between universes. How much might the real universe (or multiverse) encompass? A lot, although mothing like what has been imagined. Scientists have had to discover the laws of motion, the electromagnetic spectrum, biological evolution, sub-atomic particles, the strong and weak nuclear forces, quantum mechanics, mass-energy equivalence, relativity including the light speed limit, other galaxies, cosmic expansion, curvature of space, black holes, dark matter and dark energy in a universe where consciousness is not (like gravity etc) a fundamental force of nature but instead is a by-product of natural selection within temporary, local, negative entropy. This real universe is the setting of Poul Anderson's hard sf, including his Technic History where civilizations are entropic. In Norse mythology, which Anderson celebrated, the conflicting but interacting forces of heat and cold are basic whereas consciousness, including deity, is emergent. The entropic and Norse universes come together when an explorer of a globular cluster at the far edge of another spiral arm remembers the myth of fire and ice. See:

Cloud Universe And Ginnungagap.

Monday, 20 July 2026

Predecessors And Coinages

As an sf writer, Poul Anderson is a successor of Mary Shelley, HG Wells and Robert Heinlein. Surely these three authors are his principle predecessors?

Relevant Works
Frankenstein
The Time Machine
The First Men In The Moon
The War Of The Worlds
The Shape Of Things To Come
The War In The Air
The World Set Free
The Future History
Magic, Inc.

Wells coined the terms, "Time Machine," "Time Traveller" and "time travelling" (later shortened to "time travel.") Mark Twain, writing before Wells, had used the phrase, "transposition of epochs." (Twain and L. Sprague de Camp are another two Anderson predecessors although specifically on time travel.)

When a fictional character living in 1810 is told that someone has "jumped" from 1810 to 1684, he should not immediately respond, as we would, with the phrase, "time travel." That is anachronistic. It happens in Tim Powers' The Anubis Gates.

I must finish rereading The Anubis Gates. Tomorrow, to celebrate a birthday, two of us will travel by train around Morecambe Bay. There should also soon be a family visit to a cinema to see The Odyssey. More myth.

"The Boat of Millions of Years"

The above phrase on the opening page of Tim Powers' The Anubis Gates links this book with the title of Poul Anderson's The Boat Of A Million Years as we have previously said here. Anderson's novel features slower-than-light interstellar travel by a small group of immortals whereas Powers refers directly to Egyptian mythology:

"'...the twelve hours of the night...
"'It's the course through the Tuaut, the underworld, that the dead sungod Ra follows every night on his dark voyage from sunset to sunrise. Darkness becomes solid there, and hours are a measurement of distance, like sailing on an uncoiled clock face.'"
-The Anubis Gates, 10, p. 337.

Hours as distance: travel through time. Doyle replies that he has already travelled along such a river. 

Time as a river is a major image in Poul Anderson's Time Patrol series. See The River Of Time. Ra makes a big appearance in Neil Gaiman's The Sandman.

Unique?

Is Poul Anderson unique in addressing both causality paradoxes; certainly in the comprehensiveness of his treatment of both? (Thinks: it is safer to frame this kind of proposition as a question than as a factual assertion.)

In the preceding post, with Anderson as our axis, so to say, we also referred to time travel works by:

SM Stirling (the series has to continue)
Audrey Niffenegger (we hope for a sequel)
HG Wells (whatever happened to the Time Traveller?)
Robert Heinlein
Tim Powers

- and we know that there are others. What an outstanding list of authors! This literary sequence will continue as long as there are authors and readers with intellects and imaginations.

Some Time Travel Comparisons

(i) Poul Anderson's Time Patrol series and SM Stirling's Make The Darkness Light series are opposite answers to the question whether to change history. (Assuming that you can, of course.)

(ii) Anyone who is just starting to time travel cannot know whether their timeline is mutable or immutable. Anderson's Jack Havig tries to prevent his father's death before he learns not to try. All the evidence indicates that Audrey Niffenegger's Henry DeTamble also inhabits an immutable timeline. However, wanting to be sure that he will always return to the future in which he is married to Claire, DeTamble takes extra care not to do anything that might change the course of events. Stirling's American time travellers have to find out what kind of timeline they are in. Recruits to Anderson's Time Patrol are told as part of their training.

(iii) Both HG Wells' The Time Machine and Anderson's There Will Be Time, the latter featuring Havig, describe events rushing past a time traveller.

Thus, we compare Anderson with Stirling, Niffenegger and Wells. Anderson's comprehensive treatment of both time travel paradoxes, causality violation and circular causality, makes his works a pivotal point of comparison with other time travel authors.

Now consider a time travel conundrum in Tim Powers' The Anubis Gates. I could have discussed this on the Logic of Time Travel blog but far fewer people would have read it there. In fact, I have tried to redirect readers from that blog to this one: see About Time Travel. We will find that issues raised by Powers have already been addressed in (i) or (ii) above. 

Trapped inside a burning tent, Doctor Romany can escape only by jumping through time:

"...he tried to decide what time to jump to. Sometime in the future? No, not when it meant leaving tonight's debacle as established history. Better to jump into the past, fix things up so that the situation tonight's aborted effort was supposed to remedy never would have arisen in the first place."
-Tim Powers, The Anubis Gates (London, 1986), 9, p. 274.

Romany, thinking in terms of (i), does not yet known that he is living in an immutable timeline as in (ii). Nevertheless, it is sensible, from his point of view, to travel into the past when he can use his knowledge from the future to try to counteract the effects of the situation that he had wanted to remedy. You can do a lot in the past as the hero of Robert Heinlein's The Door Into Summer learns.

Also in The Anubis Gates, in 1810, Brendan Doyle finds a hand-written volume recording events on 4 February, 1684. On the endpaper, in his own handwriting although faded with age, he reads:

"IHAY, ENDANBRAY, ANCAY OUYAY IGITDAY?" (8, p. 258)

Needless to say, later in the novel, Doyle visits 1684 and writes this mocking note to his younger self.

If I knew at what point to start writing a circular causality narrative, I would do it.

Sunday, 19 July 2026

"It's Not As Simple As That!"

Nothing is ever simple, is it? The previous post, Identities, left out complexities in all three of the novels cited. In particular, another way to duplicate the consciousness of a person is simply to duplicate the person. If a living duplicate of an organism duplicates the organism's neural states, then it also duplicates that organism's mental states: not A thinking that he is B but two people thinking that they are A. See Poul Anderson's "Symmetry" and the magically generated duplicates called "ka's" in The Anubis Gates where a duplicate Lord Byron has entertainment value - and might be based on reports of a double of Byron according to the quotation at the head of Chapter 8.

Of course, a time traveller can at least temporarily duplicate himself by coexisting with his younger or older self (see A Case In Point) or maybe by initiating a divergent timeline containing an alternative version of himself.

That is enough about that, I think.

Identities

Neuronic events generate mental events. This has become a cliche but in fact is a very recent scientific discovery. Electrically firing neurons generate sensations which would not otherwise exist. Complicated electrochemical interactions between electrically firing neurons generate thoughts and personalities which would not otherwise exist.

(i) If person A's brain duplicated the interactions in person B's brain, then A would think that he was B, complete with B's memories, motivations etc. 

(ii) If an artificial neural network duplicated B's neuronic interactions, then that network would reproduce B's consciousness and sense of identity.

(iii) If some other technology exactly duplicated the effects of neuronic interactions, then that technology would generate self-conscious individuals maybe thinking that they were living on Earth in a particular historical period. 

(i) happens in Tim Power's The Anubis Gates

(ii) happens in Poul Anderson's Harvest Of Stars.

(iii) happens in Anderson's Genesis.

In The Anubis Gates, a character seeks immortality by repeatedly projecting his personality into someone else's body while at the same time displacing that person's personality into his own abandoned and soon-to-die body. 

The idea that personalities can be generated and duplicated in these ways links these three novels.

Time Travel Scenarios

Returned from the Viking Festival, where a guy at a stall blew through a tube to make small pewter Thor's hammers, we resume rereading Tim Powers' The Anubis Gates which remains fascinating although it really belongs on the Logic of Time Travel blog which, however, has effectively transferred its functions here, to the Poul Anderson Appreciation blog. See About Time Travel.

Meanwhile, SM Stirling's The Lords Of Creation, Volume III, The Lords Of Creation, should be en route via eBay. "Poul" and other sf writers have their says at the beginning of Volume I or II as far as I can remember without being able to check the text momentarily.

Contemporary fiction has a single premise: that the contemporary world exists as it does because history occurred as recorded. Sf varies its premises. Poul Anderson's Time Patrol would be unnecessary in The Anubis Gates. How would the Patrol respond to the events of SM Stirling's To Turn The Tide? As a matter of fact, in the Patrol timeline, there is not, as far as we know, any world-wide nuclear war in 2032. Therefore, the Patrol would prevent such a war from occurring and would also, of course, try to prevent any time travellers from changing history in the second century CE.

Good guys in one scenario are bad guys in another.