Poul Anderson Appreciation
Thursday, 4 June 2026
The Experience Of Reading
OROSZLANSZIV And Reading
I am drafting a slightly longer post on the experience of reading in general and on how this relates to Poul Anderson in particular. However, having returned home from the gym, I must now go out to a meeting so that post will probably be deferred until tomorrow.
There is no end in sight.
I also must catch up with recent novels by SM Stirling whom this blog recognizes as a worthy successor of Poul Anderson as well as a writer in his own right. But that is one of a number of other stories.
Good evening or good night.
Wednesday, 3 June 2026
How Much Rationalization?
Three Hearts And Three Lions, CHAPTER TWELVE.
(An inaccurate cover illustration, unless the dwarf gets a donkey later in the novel. (I post as I reread and can't remember everything.))
A giant cannot just be a very big man with normal human bodily proportions:
"...the creature was humanoid, though grotesquely squat and short-legged in proportion to height. Well, [Holger's] thought flashed, even if the law of proportion doesn't work quite the same here as at home, he needs enough cross section to bear his weight." (pp. 73-74)
More scientific rationalization.
See:
Rules, Riddles And Radioactivity
If all the fantasy ideas are scientifically rationalized, then the narrative becomes sf. But there are some genuinely supernatural agencies in the Carolingian. Holger thinks so. He converts to Catholicism. Does the force that unites the multiverse have a personal aspect in some universes but an impersonal one in others?
Sunlight
Three Hearts And Three Lions, CHAPTER TWELVE.
If I post about some obvious point in a text by Poul Anderson, then there is a good chance that I have posted about it before. However, there remain many unobvious points. Some legendary supernatural beings are vulnerable to sunlight so what would it feel like for them to be caught in it?
"As the first beams touched him, Balamorg screamed. Holger had never heard such agony before... He writhed and changed, gruesomely." (p. 79)
CS Lewis dreams:
Coventry
Three Hearts And Three Lions, CHAPTER TWELVE.
Alianora:
Tuesday, 2 June 2026
The Unicorn
Three Hearts And Three Lions.
I am back home from the Gregson. It is getting late. I am not going to research this post, just write from memory.
Alianora rides a unicorn. Holger does not understand her affinity with it. I think that readers are supposed to understand that virgins have an affinity with unicorns?
In Larry Niven's The Flight Of The Horse, a male character describes a female character who has not come on-stage yet as a "frigid bitch." When this young woman does come on-stage, she is a cheerful and sympathetic character - and has an affinity with a unicorn.
When Holger and Morgan le Fay embrace, Alianora approaches on her unicorn which throws her and bolts, never to return! The two women insult each other like fishwives and Holger must choose between them. He does not side with Chaos.
There. That is a short post before returning to late night other reading. There is always something to write about although it is never predictable what it is going to be.
Valduma
See:
An earlier Andersonian villainess named Valduma is also of their ilk.
See:
Whimpering Wind, Different Species And Primeval Chaos
Rereading "Sargasso of Lost Starships" would probably give us some appropriate quotation from Valduma. However, I am on my way out to the Gregson which is why I have resorted to a few blog links. And I am amazed at how much completely forgotten information is to be found in earlier posts.
Monday, 1 June 2026
Morgan Le Fay And Raor
Three Hearts And Three Lions, CHAPTER ELEVEN.
Queen Morgan le Fay tries to win Holger for Chaos:
Holger Philosophizes
Three Hearts And Three Lions, CHAPTER ELEVEN.
"The symmetry was suggestive. In Holger's home world, physical forces were strong and well understood, mental-magical forces weak and unmanageable. In this universe the opposite held true. Both worlds were, in some obscure way, one; the endless struggle between Law and Chaos had reached a simultaneous climax in them. As for the force which made them so parallel, the ultimate oneness itself, he supposed he would have to break down and call it God. But he lacked a theological bent of mind. He'd rather stick to what he had directly observed, and to immediate practical problems. Such as his own reason for being here." (pp. 66-67)
No, he does not have to call ultimate oneness "God."
See:
Two propositions seem intuitively valid: first, that all is one; secondly, that change occurs because opposed forces interact. However, I suggest that energy and inertia are more fundamental than Law and Chaos - and they are definitely preconscious.
See:
Ultimate Social And Cosmic Developments
How to deal with a dragon: throw water in its mouth. (CHAPTER TEN.)