In a prophetic tradition, it is necessary to be neither polytheist nor atheist but monotheist. Also, monotheism can become monist but this is regarded as heretical whereas, in a contemplative tradition, it is possible to be polytheist, monotheist, atheist or monist! Vaishnavites (Hindu worshippers of Vishnu) mythologize the Buddha, founder of an atheist/monotheist tradition, as an avatar of their deity, a role that he shares with Krishna. I really dig spiritual diversity. We can practice alongside others who reflect reality differently. Traditions coexist in Anderson's Terran Empire.
Poul Anderson Appreciation
Thursday, 9 July 2026
Traditions
Lamentations
Onward and upward.
"...Will Not Taste Death..."
My main reading at present is an analysis of the New Testament:
"Amen I'm telling you that there are some of those standing here who will not taste death until they see the kingdom of God come in power." (Mk, 9:1)
"Amen I'm telling you that there are some of those standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom." (Mt, 16:28)
Matthew edits a Markan passage in which Jesus predicts an imminent political and spiritual liberation.
This makes me even more appreciative of Poul Anderson's reproduction of such expectations and aspirations in a work of fiction. Tatiana Thane asks Chunderban Desai:
Wednesday, 8 July 2026
Acres And Wildfowl
Search The Scriptures (Or At Least The Time Travel Texts)
Behold The Man by Michael Moorcock
The Nantucket Trilogy by SM Stirling
The Time Patrol series by Poul Anderson
There Will Be Time by Poul Anderson
Past Times by Poul Anderson
Somewhere on Stirling's Nantucket, the question is asked: if time travellers go BC and prevent Christianity, will they thus also prevent salvation? A question for Christian theologians. Knowing them, indeed knowing people in general, they will give different answers.
Tuesday, 7 July 2026
Language
That cooperative manipulation of the environment which generated speech differentiated homo sapiens from all other animal species. Consider the following progression:
Monday, 6 July 2026
Other Reading, All Relevant II
The Winds Of Fate by SM Stirling (that is one amazing cover, reproduced very indistinctly here);
Jesus Of Nazareth: an independent historian's account of his life and teaching by Maurice Casey.
I met Maurice once briefly through his student, James Crossley. Checking through this newly arrived book, I realize that I had misunderstood one detail of what Maurice had said in that single conversation but that is hardly surprising. Learning continues.
In Poul Anderson's works, two sets of time travellers skirt around the origins of Christianity but Anderson avoids answers which we must seek where we can find them elsewhere.
All this is relevant.
Other Reading, All Relevant
Before departing, I had begun to reread The Anubis Gates by Tim Powers. On the opening page of this text, we read:
Wednesday, 1 July 2026
Again Heinlein And Anderson
"Life-Line" was:
Heinlein's first published work of fiction;
published by John W. Campbell in Astounding, August 1939;
the opening story of his Future History;
set in 1951 -
- and, although not a time travel story, it presented a temporal paradox.
Thus, this single short story prefigures much. Heinlein wrote the Future History; Anderson wrote eight future histories. Heinlein wrote three works about the circular causality paradox; Anderson wrote three works about that paradox and a series about both causality paradoxes. Anderson's culminating future history, Genesis (2000), re-presents the Frankensteinian theme on a Stapledonian scale.
Heinlein and beyond.
(And what a half-century to have lived through. I was born in '49.)
Causal Circles
The Anubis Gates, like Poul Anderson's There Will Be Time and Robert Heinlein's "By His Bootstraps," is set in a single immutable timeline where past events can be caused but neither prevented nor altered. In such a story, when a causal circle has been completed, the story is complete and there is no room for a sequel.
Poul Anderson's Time Patrol series also features causal circles but in a context of potential causality violation where closure of circles prevents alterations. One paradox is used to prevent another: