Roma Mater, III.
Gratillonius' widowed father, Marcus, lays on a feast:
Roma Mater, III.
Gratillonius' widowed father, Marcus, lays on a feast:
Roma Mater, II.
The poet agrees that he speaks truth:
Roma Mater, II.
The poet, Laidchen maqq Barchedo, praises King Niall in verse at a feast. Niall says afterwards:
"'What a poet says is true.'" (p. 42) (!)
What is truth?
Niall adds:
"'He may find fresh words for the clothing of truth...'" (ibid.)
In other words, a story can be told in different ways. The druid, Nemain maqq Aedo, agrees and elaborates:
"'...indeed truth is a lady who has many different garments to wear.'" (ibid.)
Are we still talking about truth?
Poets, like prophets, were regarded as inspired. We have posted about "Homer and the poets" a few times before. See here.
Roma Mater, II.
Imbolc means:
Chapters numbers are Roman in the text but Arabic in the Notes. Thus, II, as above, becomes 2.
In Chapter II, four and a half informative, descriptive pages precede the first words of dialogue.
The opening word of the chapter is:
"Imbolc..." (p. 31)
The first Note under 2 explains that Imbolc is 1 February and a pagan festival taking place about then. However, this first Note for 2 is preceded by a page-long introduction about:
"The history of Ireland..." (p. 448)
Sagas, poems and chronicles, written centuries later, contain contradictions, anachronisms and impossibilities. Medieval chroniclers misunderstood, altered and invented. Rome never ruled Ireland so Roman historians recorded nothing relevant.
I am sure that, when I was at secondary school in the Republic of Ireland, I read a legend that a famous Irish pagan hero returned from Tir na nOg and was converted by St Patrick. However, the story that I have found on line is that Oisin and another figure met Patrick (scroll down) but defended their pagan lifestyle.
I reiterate this now for two reasons.
First, I am rereading a novelist who occasionally switches povs in mid-dialogue. This is bad.
Secondly, I think that there is a direct connection between points of view in fiction and the mind-body problem in philosophy. A novelist can present an objective account of a garden. Then he can describe the sensations and thoughts of a character who enters the garden. Readers know that these are two kinds of accounts. They reflect our experience. We live with what novelists describe and with what philosophers analyze and contemplate. My latest post on the philosophical question is here.
Meanwhile, Poul and Karen Anderson's The King Of Ys, Volume I, Roma Mater, when reread, proves, as expected, to be rich in previously unexamined details. More to follow.
Roma Mater.
As far as I can gather, the Mithraist, Parnesius, and his friend, Pertinax, are fictional characters created by Rudyard Kipling and the Andersons make them also co-religionists and friends of Gratillonius. Kipling makes Parnesius a centurion in the Thirtieth Legion but that was stationed elsewhere so the Andersons move him into the Twentieth, thus enabling him not only to be at the Wall as described by Kipling but also to meet Gratillonius there as described by them. This is one of many such details that I had not properly noticed or appreciated on three previous readings of The King Of Ys.
I expect the current rereading to be slow - leisurely - and to focus on this kind of detail of which there will be many.
Poul Anderson's works encompass both the Roman Empire and the Terran Empire - and also a lot more than empires!
Roma Mater.
Gratillonius worships neither Jupiter nor Christ but Mithras. That is diverse enough for me although it is not to the liking of the Roman authorities represented in Britain at that time by Magnus Clemens Maximus.
Gratillonius reflects that earthly rank counts for nothing either before Ahura-Mazda or before the Christian God. However, Christians include women. In Gratillonius' family, his father, brother and himself are Mithraists whereas his mother and sisters are Christians:
"Could that alone be why Christ was triumphing?" (p. 28)
Well, of course it is, or a major part of the reason. Those sisters will have their sons as well as their daughters baptized. In a generation or two, there will be no more Mithraists.
If women could not be initiated into the mystery of Mithras, then maybe Mithraism could have allied itself to the mystery of Demeter, Cybele, Isis, Athena or Semele etc? In any case, a potential world religion cannot exclude half the human race.
Mithraism would have triumphed over Christianity only by becoming more like Christianity. Maybe the story of Mithras sacrificing the Bull would have had to be historicized, happening under Caesar Augustus? The new age demanded a new historical beginning.
In Poul Anderson's Technic History:
Adzel converts to Mahayana Buddhism while studying planetology on Earth;
Axor is converted to Jerusalem Catholicism by Galilean missionaries on Woden;
human beings join choths on Avalon;
Tabitha Falkayn says, "'Most of us keep to the Old Faith, you know.'" (See here) but also: "'God stoop on me...,'" (see Many Transitions) an expression from the New Faith;
Olaf Magnusson accepts the God of the Roidhunate;
old traditions are preserved, e.g., OrthoChristianity on Dennitza;
Aeneans include Christians but also Cosmenosists;
Altai has a Muslim-Buddhist synthesis;
there is a Sikh in the Terran Navy;
Djana, conditioned by Ydwyr, has a vision of a Merseian Christ...but this is not a positive development.
For the most part, embrace diversity.
"Thunsba was monotheistic. The theology was subtle and complex, the ritual emotionally satisfying, the commandments flexible enough to accommodate ordinary fleshly weaknesses. Nobody doubted the essential truth of the religion; but its Temple was another matter." (pp. 263-264)
We want to be told more about the subtle and complex theology which, however, is not necessary for the story. The abbot is a good being who:
wants Galactic technology to improve the lives of peasants;
wants to read Galactic books on astronomy;
cooperates with Wing Alak.
Other extra-solar monotheisms in Poul Anderson's works: