Poul Anderson, "License" IN Anderson,
Seven Conquests (New York, 1970), pp. 141-167.
The author's introduction to this story:
"Wars could not be fought were men psychologically unable to fight. An abolition of war, if such can be accomplished, will leave us with that potentiality of violence. How then shall we express it?" (p. 141)
Some regular blog readers might know that this issue has been an on-off bone of contention in post comboxes for quite a while. I certainly have no intention of plodding through that argument yet again. However, I am responding to Poul Anderson's text. I will say what I think although I might use an editorial "we" now and again.
The first sentence is undeniable. Men psychologically unable to fight would not be able to fight in wars. This ability to fight is a potentiality to fight or a possibility of fighting. However, we now reach an ambiguity. (I think.) The phrase "potentiality of violence" can mean either:
(i) we have the potential to respond violently to certain situations (the classic challenge to a pacifist: "What would you do if you saw an enemy soldier about to rape your sister?" etc);
- or:
(ii) there is in each and every one of us the potentiality suddenly to behave violently in any and every situation, even without any threat, provocation, deprivation etc.
I agree with (i) but not with (ii). But the question, "How then shall we express it?" seems to assume some version of (ii).
Wars happen not because large numbers of individuals in one country suddenly want to attack large numbers of individuals in another country but because, for historical, economic and political reasons, each country maintains armed forces and sometimes uses them. We can discuss how to organize countries differently. Social organization has already changed significantly several times throughout history and prehistory, after all.
Imagine:
a world federation of democratic republics;
each republic maintains at most an internal police force but not any bodies of armed men for attacking/defending against each other;
resources that would have gone into massive arms expenditure go instead into social infrastructure and into addressing common problems;
the republics trade, publish new scientific discoveries and cooperate economically and in maintaining the environment.
"...if such can be accomplished..." We can try to work towards it. Or we can say that the problem is insoluble.
I have yet to reread "License" and cannot remember what happens in it. But that can be another discussion.