Wednesday, 17 February 2021

Desai And Toynbee

My mission, should I choose to accept it, will be, first, to reread earlier blog posts about the Hord/Desai theory of history, secondly, to extract a summary of Toynbean theory from Wikipedia and, thirdly, to compare them. Not an in-depth study but maybe sufficient for present purposes.

For John K. Hord on the blog, see here.
For Chunderban Desai, see here.
For Desai on the stages of a historical cycle, see here.
For Toynbean stages, see here.

According to Toynbee:
 
response to challenge transforms primitive societies into civilizations;

a cycle of challenge and response causes growth;

in 1939, the challenge for Modern Western society was to create a political world-order and the framework for an economic world-order;

a civilization breaks down when its "Creative Minority" degenerates into a "Dominant Minority";

in the final breakdown, the"Dominant Minority" creates a universal state to preserve its power.

Desai refers to growth, breakdown and the universal state.

1 comment:

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Paul!

Hord did not agree with Toynbee about "Creative" vs. "Dominant" minorities, probably because he thought such formulations too simplistic. At least Anderson did not use such terms when discussing Hord's work in "Concerning Future Histories."

Ad astra! Sean