Tuesday 21 March 2023

Belief And Unbelief

Of course willing suspension of disbelief is involved in all reading of fiction, including all fantasy and science fiction. However, one difference remains. Human characters created by both Poul Anderson and CS Lewis encounter both Martians and demons. In Anderson's works, Martians and demons are on an equal footing. Both are fictional. In Lewis' works, Martians are fictional but demons are not. In works both of non-fiction and of fiction, Lewis polemicizes for a world-view in which supernatural beings, including demons, literally exist.

"Though he was theoretically a materialist, he had all his life believed quite inconsistently, and even carelessly, in the freedom of his own will."
-CS Lewis, That Hideous Strength IN Lewis, The Cosmic Trilogy (London, 1990), pp. 349-752 AT CHAPTER 12, 7, p. 630.

What is free will and why is it inconsistent with materialism? We can discuss such questions and an author can show his characters discussing them but, in this passage, the narrator (who is sometimes omniscient and sometimes first person) assumes a traditional theological position on the issue. We should appreciate the work as a novel, a long prose fiction, while also understanding that some of its passages are polemical - and we may well disagree with its author.

5 comments:

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Paul!

Well, * I * believe angels, including fallen angels, are real supernatural beings.

Ad astra! Sean

S.M. Stirling said...

Paul:

Lewis was a very intelligent man, but he had an odd conception of science. Specifically, it was very old-fashioned, even in his time -- he saw it as rather like what a mid-Victorian dogmatic materialist might have believed.

In that schema, every event/condition was predetermined by chains of mechanical causation, rather like billiard balls on a frictionless surface.

That really -was- incompatible with 'free will' as generally understood.

The more modern concept of causation is that it's probabilistic, not deterministic; that is, some things are more likely than others... but unlikely things happen all the time.

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Mr. Stirling!

IOW, Lewis seems to have completely ignored things Einstein's General Theory and quantum mechanics, both of which did so much to shake up science!

Ad astra! Sean

S.M. Stirling said...

Sean: well, literature/the arts and science were much more compartmentalized in his day.

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Mr. Stirling!

True, but there were scientists like Sir Arthur Eddington who tried to explain such things in ways non scientists could understand when Lewis was still quite young.

I think Anderson had Eddington in mind in that fictional preface to THREE HEARTS AND THREE LIONS.

Ad astra! Sean