"...because, of course, nothing in the past can be altered."
-CS Lewis, The Great Divorce (London, 1946), p. 9.
Anderson fans think, "No need for a Time Patrol then!" But there is more to it than that, isn't there? Presumably, this time traveller would not be able to move because air molecules would not get out of his way? The author imagines that past events retain their unalterability even when the traveller has arrived among them, when he has made them his present, as they say in Anderson's Time Patrol series.
No one else has written a story about a pastward time traveller pierced by raindrops or unable to move objects. If he is unable to alter events, then this must be for some other reason as ingeniously investigated by Anderson in works that do not involve the Time Patrol or by Audrey Niffenegger and some others.
3 comments:
Kaor, Paul!
Alas, the story you summarized rings no bells with me. An annotated edition of THE GREAT DIVORCE should include a note telling us which story Lewis had in mind.
Ad astra! Sean
Sean,
If anyone can find it.
Paul.
Kaor, Paul!
Someone would have to pore thru American SF magazines from 1943, 1944, and 1945 trying to find it.
Ad astra! Sean
Post a Comment