PCs and laptops are not conscious. A different kind of artifact that not only computed but also duplicated other brain functions would be conscious. But imagine an unconscious computer that:
is voice-controlled;
answers questions;
asks follow-up questions to clarify what information is needed;
is programmed to volunteer information when appropriate;
(but does not consciously "know" when to volunteer;)
thus, can conduct a conversation (passing the Turing test?).
We would "animize" or personify this kind of computer.
When Evalyth tells the computer in her cabin that its owner/user/master was killed and eaten, it continues the conversation without any emotional response. Of course. It is neither conscious nor programmed to simulate emotions. When asked for any further advice, it says that the murderer should not be summarily killed but examined in accordance with the expedition's scientific aims. It is then that Evalyth, widow of the murdered man, reflects in anguish that she is conversing with a machine but also with one that reflects her husband's personality:
"It's designed to help research. Nothing more. But it was his. And its answer was so altogether Donli that she could no longer hold back her tears." (p. 690)
1 comment:
Kaor, Paul!
Despite being written more than half a century ago, "The Sharing of Flesh" was one of Anderson's best stories--and justly won a Hugo. And that was at a time when Hugos were still deserving and worthy of respect.
Considering how OFTEN my ancient Radio Shack chess computer beats me, I'm sometimes tempted to personalize it! (Smiles)
Ad astra! Sean
Post a Comment