The common sub-genre comprises those works, sometimes "utopian," addressing the question: how to change society with the help of science? CS Lewis parodies this question in his Ransom Trilogy, Volume III, That Hideous Strength, where his scientific social reformers are literally demonically controlled.
I see this as the central dynamic of twentieth century sf: Wells and Stapledon opposed by Lewis but followed by Heinlein, Anderson, Blish etc with Anderson and Blish addressing theological questions. Lewis wrote The Problem Of Pain and Anderson wrote "The Problem of Pain." Lewis describes the sinless planet, Perelandra (Venus) and Blish describes the sinless planet, Lithia (extra-solar). And so on.
In the Psychotechnic History, the question is: how does the world reconstruct after a limited nuclear exchange?
UN world government, becoming the Solar Union.
A secret service led by the fanatically anti-nationalist Fourre.
Un-men and the cloned Rostomily Brotherhood.
Suppression of conspiracies by nationalists and other turn-back-the-clock merchants.
Centralized agriculture.
Massive single-structure urban residential complexes.
Colonies under the sea and on other planets.
The work of the Psychotechnic Institute both in a predictive science of society (impossible but this sf) and in human psychophysiology.
Everything fails! But there are psychotechnicians in a peaceful Galactic civilization millennia later.
12 comments:
I think Poul later regretted that series...
I find it fascinating both in itself and as a contrast.
Kaor, Paul!
But why? Anderson became very dissatisfied with the Psychotecnic stories, as he made plain in the "Afterword" he wrote for THE PSYCHOTECHNIC LEAGUE. I would argue that how an author regards his own works should guide how their regards them.
I think the best of the Psychotechnic stories is VIRGIN PLANET.
Ad astra! Sean
Sean,
I like it.
Paul.
Yes, VIRGIN PLANET is a hoot.
He did get a few things wrong. For example, in men's prisons about half engage in homosexual conduct; in women's prisons it's closer to 100%
I prefer THE PEREGRINE.
Kaor, Mr. Stirling and Paul!
Mr. Stirling: VIRGIN PLANET was always a fun read for me whenever I read it.
We do get enough indications in VIRGIN to realize that the women stranded on Avalon (and their parthenogenetic descendants) took recourse to lesbianism (or most of them). But Anderson did not feel any need to make a big deal of that, because the overriding point he was making was the discovery of males of their own species by those women. And its implications.
Paul: Again, why? Anderson wrote very few weak stories, and THE PEREGRINE is not one of them. But neither does it stand out as sharply to me as does many others of his works.
Ad astra! Sean
Sean,
Just a subjective preference: the interstellar scale and the interactions between the different kinds of characters.
Paul.
Kaor, Mr. Stirling and Paul!
Mr. Stirling: Avalon, in VIRGIN PLANET, was a very weird place. A planet accidentally settled by women and unable to reproduce normally. Parthenogenetic twin sister "descendants"!
Paul: Understood, nothing wrong with that. But THE PEREGRINE still seems a bit "flat" compared with VIRGIN PLANET.
Ad astra! Sean
Atlantis.
Kaor, Paul!
Dang! I got the names muddled.
Thanks! Sean
Post a Comment