I think that the most fundamental philosophical problem is the relationship between being and consciousness. The Time Machine and James Blish's The Quincunx of Time describe immaterial consciousnesses moving inexorably along a Fourth Dimension identified with Time, a notion fraught with philosophical problems that I have addressed elsewhere. A basic part of this philosophical problem is the mind-body question. Neurologists study brains. Psychologists study minds. Philosophers study the relationship between minds and brains. None of us is able to perceive a psychophysical organism as a totality in all its aspects. It is as if we see a circle, knowing that the circle is a flat cross-section of a sphere, but we are unable to perceive the whole sphere in all its three dimensions. Would a sufficiently powerful deity be able to perceive body and mind as a single entity? Is this what Aycharaych, the universal telepath, can do?
What can Aycharaych do that we cannot? We perceive the body and behaviour of an animal or a human being and infer its/his/her consciousness. We think that a cat is conscious of a bird when we see the cat stalking the bird whereas we do not think, except in imagination, that a wound-up clockwork toy soldier is consciously obeying the order, "Forward march!" when we see it perambulating across the floor. However, we do not normally perceive any of the inner workings either of the organism or of the mechanism. Nor does Aycharaych. All that he does that we do not is to sense and interpret neural emissions. (I think that we are told somewhere that they are very long-wave.) Aycharaych literally has a sixth sense. Beyond that, the mystery of the mind-brain relationship remains unsolved.
7 comments:
Kaor, Paul!
You did not mention Wells' THE ISLAND OF DR MOREAU, where we see a man, Dr Moreau, trying to "uplift" beasts to the level of human beings via medical/surgical means, and failing hideously. It's not enough to make an animal's body like that of a human if its mind simply cannot be at least like a human's mind.
Ad astra! Sean
Sean,
I do not mention Moreau because I find him quite unpleasant.
Paul.
Kaor, Paul!
I agree Wells' THE ISLAND OF DR MOREAU is unpleasant reading. But Wells still wrote it and raised issues in it deserving of comment.
Nowadays similar would-be Dr. Moreaus would manipulate the genes of animals in attempts at changing them.
Ad astra! Sean
Fairly successfully, too. And not for the first time. Dogs are quite different from wolves, and we did that.
Kaor, Mr. Stirling!
True, but I do have some caveats. Dogs are still related closely enough to wolves that interbreeding is possible. Also, when for whatever reason, dogs go feral they rapidly more like wolves.
Really, humans don't deserve the unconditional love and loyalty they get from dogs!
I had your Draka genetic engineers in mind, as seen in THE STONE DOGS and DRAKON, manipulating genes to change animals or create weird chimeras/hybrids like gholeloons (a revolting mix of lions and humans). And Draka abominations didn't stop with that!
Ad astra! Sean
Sean: it's fairly simple. We ate the dogs that -didn't- give unconditional love and loyalty.
Kaor, Mr. Stirling!
I can believe that--even tho it feels somehow wrong to eat dogs!
Ad astra! Sean
Post a Comment