Causal loops are subtle. An incipient causal loop is dangerous because it can set up a resonance which can cause changes of history that multiply catastrophically. The loop is made safe by closing it.
In "Star of the Sea":
Causal loops often have a powerful and subtle force. It is necessary to prevent a causal loop from developing into a causal vortex.
Terminology
Causal loop:
"'The time traveler becomes a cause of the selfsame events he set out to study or otherwise deal with.'" (Time Patrol, p. 448)
"'...our investigation of a disturbance to the plenum is what brought it about.'" (p. 559)
Clear. But what are:
an incipient causal loop?
a resonance?
a causal vortex?
The changes of history multiplying catastrophically sound as if they might be a vortex.
Everard has to rely on intuition based on a lot of experience:
"'I looked deeper into your case mainly because of a hunch, an uneasy feeling that something wasn't right.'" (p. 448)
His assessment of a situation can change:
"'No, this is no slight ripple in the time stream. This is a maelstrom abuilding. We've got to damp it out...'" (p. 450)
Yet later:
"'...that was quite a minor eddy in the time stream, easily damped...'" (p. 566)
Again, intuition is involved:
"'This is different. I don't know how it is, but I feel it in my marrow.'" (ibid.)
Only intuition can respond to unpredictability.
3 comments:
Kaor, Paul!
Intuitions and hunches are fine, when they are correct, which I don't think will always be the case.
Ad astra! Sean
Intuitions & hunches are what you use to decide what to investigate *first*. Just don't fall in love with your hypothesis. Ask the question "What would be evidence *against* it".
Kaor, Jim!
Confirmation bias can and will be a problem!
Ad astra! Sean
Post a Comment