Wednesday 15 July 2020

Life And Time

All literature is about life and time. A biographical novel can begin with its central character's birth and end with his return in old age to the place of his birth. We appreciate time passed and can also experience vicarious nostalgia. Science fiction adds time travel, time dilation and other tricks with time but can also address time in the same way as other fiction. Poul Anderson's titles include Time And Stars and The Horn Of Time.

The opening sentence of Anderson's Genesis promises that the story is of a man, a woman and a world and that ghosts, gods and mysterious time pass through it. Does the novel keep its promise about time?

First, it covers cosmological periods of time:

many galactic orbits;
enough time for a slower than light intergalactic crossing;
long enough for humanity to become extinct  and to be re-created.

"'I made the first of them about fifty thousand years ago.'"
-PART TWO, XII, p. 243.

Secondly, it informs us of different timescales. See Days And Eons.

Thirdly, the node of the galactic brain that recreates humanity also emulates (consciously simulates) alternative timelines.

Fourthly, when asked why she has recreated human beings, the node Gaia replies:

"'That humankind might live once more.' A sigh as of time itself blowing past."
-ibid.

And there indeed time passes through the narrative.

5 comments:

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Paul!

I can think of other stories by Anderson using the word "time," such as "Time Heals," or THERE WILL BE TIME.

I agree, Anderson vindicated or justified that opening sentence of GENESIS.

I might not have had Gaia saying she "created" human beings. Almost certainly she used stored genetic material to bring the human race back from extinction.

Also, Gaia seems to have deliberately refused to become a part of that "galactic brain," an independent node.

Ad astra! Sean

paulshackley2017@gmail.com said...

Sean,

Gaia probably used stored genetic material but we are not told. The alternative is that she reproduced the conditions that originally generated life, then speeded up the process considerably.

Paul.

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Paul!

I think it's far simpler and more likely that stored genetic material was used. To say nothing of being quicker!

Ad astra! Sean

S.M. Stirling said...

Genetic material isn't essential.

You only need the -information- in the genetic material, from which you can construct the genes from simpler chemicals. Life has already been "created" this way with synthetic organisms.

It's really a distinction without a difference; genes -are- information. Information in one "alphabet" (say, bits and bytes) can be transformed into another -- amino acids and so forth.

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Mr. Stiring!

And I'm sure it won't be long, whatever the ethics might be, before some researchers will be breeding or cloning human beings like this. Possibly, it's already happened, in secret.

Also, I still think stored genetic material will be at least convenient.

Ad astra! Sean