Sorry folks, I have got involved in an email discussion of human immortality with a professional philosopher which is a bit time-consuming. The question of survival after death is relevant to several works by Poul Anderson as is every other major issue.
Continuing to welcome new blog readers:
please see the previous post;
please also comment on blog posts;
so far, two blog readers have submitted articles for publication on the blog (see here) - others can;
please also check other blogs listed on the right hand side of the screen.
In The High Crusade, Anderson makes each stage of the medieval Englishmen's interstellar conquests seem plausible:
the Wersgorix home planet has a denser atmosphere so that Brother Parvus can easily hear their whispers in a terrestroid atmosphere;
the Wersgorix idea of a truce is based on expediency, not on any concepts of honor that a knight would be unwilling to break;
playing cautious, the Wersgorix hold back, giving the English time to gain instruction in the easy spaceship and weapons control systems from their prisoners;
the Wersgorix do not want to look incompetent by immediately informing the imperial capital of their initial setback;
in any case, interstellar communication is limited to light speed so that messages have to be sent in the FTL ships;
there are only three fortresses on this colony planet and the English have already captured one so it does not seem unrealistic to attack a second;
in any case, boldness is the only course open to them.
At what stage in the original reading did I begin to suspect that the English were going to win?
1 comment:
Kaor, Paul!
I agree, Poul Anderson manages to make the eventual victory of the medieval English of THE HIGH CRUSADE at least plausible. I do have some doubts they would win in a similar situation in the real world. It would depend so much on many different factors coming out just RIGHT.
Sean
Post a Comment