Wednesday, 12 March 2025

Under The Surface

Starfarers, 47-48.

The Envoy crew, returned to Earth eleven thousand years after their departure, are in the same position as HG Wells' nineteenth century Time Traveller in 802,701 AD. Everything is so different that it will take time to understand it. The Time Traveller finds Eloi on the surface but Morlocks lurking underground. What lurks underground figuratively speaking when Envoy returns?

There are what look like complex, powerful, self-sufficient installations on the Moon and in Earth orbit. Solar energy is beamed to Earth where there:

"...appeared to be a widespread, buried electrical network..." (p. 445)

There is also an Edenic ecology with scattered villages, a few small cities and scant aerial traffic. The night side is not illuminated. Is this a basis for intellectual and creative dynamism or just social stagnation?

Science has become a body of knowledge, not a search. Interpretations of natural law are elaborated, not revolutionized. Technology has not been changed for millennia. The competitiveness that drives innovation is absent but is there no inquisitiveness or inventiveness?

Robotics and nanotech have made necessities and maybe also comforts as free as air. There is no obvious coercion to control distribution or stabilize population but need there be? Nansen suggests that social pressure might be enough.

Is this uniform stable equilibrium stagnant? Rare interstellar visits have no impact. People speak to Sundaram of progress but he cannot see it yet.

3 comments:

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Paul!

Science should be understood as both a body of knowledge and a search for expanding that knowledge. To be content only with what is already known is a bad sign. And it helps a lot if both competitiveness and curiosity spurs a drive for more knowledge.

However beneficial Seladorian rule of Earth has been in many ways I recall not much liking it. It struck me as stagnant and inward looking. Too much like the Tahirians and those Merseians lookalikes!

Ad astra! Sean

S.M. Stirling said...

I'd say science is a -method-. Humans desire explanations; science provides ones that can be tested.

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Mr. Stirling!

That's better than my attempted defiition.

Ad astra! Sean