Arthur C. Clarke's third law is that any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Thus, in Poul Anderson's The Avatar, the Others, a technologically advanced race, are able to pass themselves off as beings from Irish mythology. On this analysis, all beings and laws are natural but some can be made to appear supernatural.
In other works of fiction, natural and supernatural coexist and interact. See Martians And Morpheus.
CS Lewis takes a third course of blurring the distinction between natural and supernatural. Because of the disruption associated with a house move, certain books are not currently to hand. These include both Lewis' Voyage To Venus/Perelandra and his The Cosmic Trilogy which includes Perelandra. However, I find the entire text of Perelandra on-line. This passage is worth quoting in full:
"As to my intense wish never to come into contact with the eldila myself, I am not sure whether I can make you understand it. It was something more than a prudent desire to avoid creatures alien in kind, very powerful, and very intelligent. The truth was that all I heard about them served to connect two things which one's mind tends to keep separate, and that connecting gave one a sort of shock. We tend to think about non-human intelligences in two distinct categories which we label "scientific" and "supernatural" respectively. We think, in one mood, of Mr. Wells' Martians (very unlike the real Malacandrians, by the bye), or his Selenites. In quite a different mood we let our minds loose on the possibility of angels, ghosts, fairies, and the like. But the very moment we are compelled to recognise a creature in either class as real the distinction begins to get blurred: and when it is a creature like an eldil the distinction vanishes altogether. These things were not animals--to that extent one had to classify them with the second group; but they had some kind of material vehicle whose presence could (in principle) be scientifically verified. To that extent they belonged to the first group. The distinction between natural and supernatural, in fact, broke down; and when it had done so, one realised how great a comfort it had been--how it had eased the burden of intolerable strangeness which this universe imposes on us by dividing it into two halves and encouraging the mind never to think of both in the same context. What price we may have paid for this comfort in the way of false security and accepted confusion of thought is another matter."
-copied from here (ONE, paragraph 4)
1 comment:
IINM Lewis firmly believed in human souls as a mind which is, or at least can be, separated from the human body. The materialist conception is that 'the mind is what the brain does'.
So Lewis seems inconsistent here, or perhaps is simply acknowledging a point he had previously failed to think through.
For clarity in the natural/supernatural distinction I recommend the essay 'Defining Supernatural'.
https://richardcarrier.blogspot.com/2007/01/defining-supernatural.html
Carrier defines something supernatural as something mental that is not dependent on something material, so for example a soul which survives the death of the body is supernatural.
He uses examples from popular fiction to illustrate the distinction and discuss how the supernatural could be scientifically investigated if such things were found in real life. This also implies what would take him from not believing to believing in the supernatural.
Post a Comment