Monday 10 September 2018

A Science Of Mankind?

In "Time Patrol," a "psychographic historian" knows that war, poverty and tyranny occur because machine technology had arisen in a divided world, not because of any innate human evil. Time traveling, he tries to unite the world earlier.

In Planet Of No Return, a "psychomed" says that:

a human being can believe several mutually contradictory propositions;

few learn how to think;

those few "'...think only with the surface of their minds.'" (Chapter 2, p. 16);

under the surface are conditioned reflexes and rationalized fears, hates and longings;

humanity is at last finding a science of man that will make it possible to bring up children to be sane but large scale results will take a long time;

much insanity, left over from history, is built into society.

This is the central issue of Anderson's Psychotechnic History and should be a major theme of sf although with writers presenting different answers:

Is science possible when subject and object are identical?
Different societies will ask social scientists different questions.
How much self-knowledge is possible through non-scientific practices like art and meditation? 

5 comments:

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Paul!

Commenting on the three questions you asked at the end of this blog piece.

I'm not sure how to understand the question asking if "...is science possible when subject and object are identical?" I would say yes, because if a xenologist can objectively study non human races, he can do the same for the human species. See John Ridenour in "Outpost of Empire."

I think all societies at a sufficiently advanced level to even have "social scientists" would ask them, broadly, the same questions.

Third question: MORE so than anything we are likely to get from any alleged "science of society"!

Sean

paulshackley2017@gmail.com said...

Sean,
Some societies have asked whether intelligence is connected to race. Others have not.
Paul.

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Paul!

But surely the average level of intelligence among human is connected to what makes humans Homo sapiens in the first place.

Sean

paulshackley2017@gmail.com said...

Sean,
Of course it is but a psychologist has claimed to correlate IQs with race.
Paul.

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Paul!

Now I get it! You mean the ridiculous idea that something as piffling and unimportant as skin color will indicate how intelligent you are. Absurd! I would put far more stress on CULTURAL factors, not skin color.

Sean