Stapledon is relevant here because he is the master of fictional narratives with cosmic time scales. Indeed, his Star Maker is a trans-human cosmic history. In this respect, Poul Anderson is Stapledon's direct successor both in Tau Zero and in Genesis. Stapledon's works have become dated whereas it will be a long time, if ever, before Genesis dates, at least technologically.
Having said that, it is a premise of Genesis that life is rare. Post-organic intelligences spreading from Earth at sub-light speeds have the galaxy and surrounding space to themselves. Maybe that rarity of life is being refuted right now.
Future histories always have to start from present knowledge. They generate the paradox of a history of future histories.
8 comments:
Kaor, Paul!
But, IIRC, critics have complained about Stapledon's works that his stories have no real plots, characters, action, etc., in them. It's all about abstract narrative summaries of the passing of millions of years of history. Nothing to make readers really care about what happens. If true this seems way too boring!
Ad astra! Sean
Try it.
Kaor, Paul!
Yes, but does what I think critics have said about Stapledon's works has any truth?
I have to be somewhat vague due to depending on what I think I recall reading in a history of SF called BILLION YEAR SPREE.
Ad astra! Sean
FWIW I did find Stapledon's books interesting.
"Starmaker" does have a 1st person narrator who 'explores' the universe.
"Sirius" is a smaller scale work about an uplifted dog.
Kaor, Jim!
I did read at least Stapledon's "Odd John" and "Sirius."
Ad astra! Sean
I enjoyed LAST MEN and STAR MAKER but then I like the cosmic perspective anyway.
Stapledon is an interesting writer, but you don't remember his characters.
Kaor, Mr. Stirling!
Exactly. "Odd John" and "Sirius" didn't really grab me. Never felt inclined to read his major works.
Ad astra! Sean
Post a Comment