To understand why Minamoto presents a dissenting view, we need to reread the extracts from his minority report to see what he argues against. He says:
there should be no accusations;
no one was negligent or foolish;
the people in question struggled admirably against disaster when they understand their situation;
perhaps no saner response was possible for them;
psychodrama should not be condemned;
adult psychodrama has become so unpopular that it might become extinct which would be a worse tragedy;
psychodrama has been entirely beneficial on Earth and in space;
the modern lack of experience of madness was the root of the problem;
no one blames explorers for miscalculations about the environment - the implication being that there should also be no blame for psychological miscalculations.
We may infer that the majority report says everything that Minamoto disagrees with.
1 comment:
Kaor, Paul!
I'm not entirely sure about the absence of negligence and foolishness, however. The role players in the story did allow their fictional personas to become dominant at the wrong time and place.
Ad astra! Sean
Post a Comment