Satan's World, XXII.
After one night locked in a room of his captors' castle, van Rijn gains the concession to sleep in the comparative warmth and comfort of his disabled spaceship:
"...he had been at the top of his form, cursing, coughing, wheezing, weeping, swearing by every human and nonhuman saint in or out of the catalogue that one more bedtime without respite from the temperatures, the radiation, the dust, the pollen, the heavy metals whose omnipresence not only forced outworlders to take chelating pills lest they be poisoned but made the very air taste bad, the noises, the stinks, the everything of this planet whose existence was a potent argument for the Manichaean heresy because he could not imagine why a benevolent God would wish it on the universe: another night would surely stretch his poor old corpse out stiff and painful - Finally Thea grew alarmed and took it upon herself to change their quarters." (pp. 561-562)
Often I summarize or paraphrase but sometimes only a full quotation serves. Despite her fairly intense acquaintance with van Rijn, Thea has no suspicion of his manipulative skills. A dangerous man to keep as a prisoner, he would wind up buying the prison. This performance, "...at the top of his form...," is clearly an act but was he merely letting himself go and expressing himself freely while waiting for the Shenna to communicate?
Poul Anderson might have had James Blish's A Case Of Conscience in mind when he wrote about a planet as evidence for Manichaeanism. (Mani was not a Christian heretic but a religious founder who claimed to synthesize the teachings of Zarathustra, the Buddha and Jesus.)
8 comments:
Kaor, Paul!
I think this was mostly an act. Old Nick could be perfectly calm, self controlled, and reasonable when he had to be.
If I recall correctly, Manichaeanism originated in Sassanid Persia, and spread from there. I think the founder, Mani, preached a Gnostic/dualist religion in which two Gods, good and evil, contended for supremacy. And that the world, our very bodies, were vile and disgusting creations of the evil God. And that salvation came thru gaining the true knowledge about these Gods and how to transcend material existence.
All this came from memory, so I might well be too imprecise. Nani's preachhing was regarded with disgust by the Zoroastrians, who executed him, but the religion he founded survived. And took varied forms for the next millennium in Europe: Manichaeans, Bogomils, Cathars, Albigensians. I THINK the Mandaeans of Iraq might be a last remnant of Manichaeanism.
Ad astra! Sean
Sean,
I think that Zoroastrianism and Manichaeanism are both dualistic.
Paul.
Kaor, Paul!
They are, but with Mani mixing in Gnostic ideas about secret knowledge and how vile the material world is. Again, I might be imprecise.
Ad astra! Sean
Zoroastrians are dualists in the sense that they depict the universe as a struggle between Ahura Mazda "The Wise God" and Ahriman, the incarnate Lie. Good is destined to triumph in the end.
Manichaenism is a Zoroastrian heresy which attributes equal power to Ahriman and credits him with the creation of matter and the universe of matter.
Zoroastrianism isn't strictly monotheist, but sort of demotes a lot of pre-Zoroastrian divinities to angels, more or less -- Mitra being the best-known example -- or to demonic status (for Indra, Varuna and the others).
Right. Mani as a Zoroastrian rather than a Christian heretic. Claiming to unite three traditions would get anathematized by all three.
We were told that Manichaeanism was a Christian heresy but one of my fellow pupils thought that it sounded like a good idea.
Kaor, Mr. Stirling and Paul!
Mr. Stirling: Your comments fleshes out in more detail what I said about the Manichaeans. Esp. the contempt they had for the material universe.
Paul: But Manichaeanism was a Christian heresy as well as a Zoroastrian one. It warped and mixed in Christian beliefs as well. Such as exalting Ahriman/Satan to being a deity equal to God. The Manichaeans managed to offend both orthodox Christians and Zoroastrians. And the Buddhists, of course.
It's disturbing you knew someone who thought Manichaeanism was a good idea! Does he really want to believe the material is loathsome and despicable? Or that Ahriman/Satan is a God?
I can easily see a form of Manichaeanism arising which would discard ides about a good God and desiring only evil and the worship of Satan. IOW, we would get the horrible religion of the Peacock Angel Stirling shows us in THE PESHAWAR LANCERS.q
Ad astra! Sean
Sean,
He liked the good versus evil routine, not the sordid details.
Paul.
Kaor, Paul!
Then he would do better to be an orthodox Zoroastrian. Or a Catholic!
Ad astra! Sean
Post a Comment