Monday 4 February 2019

The Broken Sword, Original And Revised, Part Two, by Nicholas David Rosen

There is something more to be said about the differences between the two versions of THE BROKEN SWORD; saying this does not give away the whole story by any means, but it does hint at what will happen in the course of the tale, so those who have not read THE BROKEN SWORD and hope to do so may wish to refrain from reading further.

In the original version of the book, the witch summons Satan twice.  The first time, he advises her on how she can achieve revenge against her enemies (including the wife and children of the Viking chief who slaughtered her family and took their land).  The second time, a band of elves dispatched by Earl Imric are seeking her life, so she calls upon her master Satan to preserve her.  He refuses, calling himself the lord of evil, which is futility, and leaving her to be killed.  It is nothing to him whether she lives to see her revenge completed, and he tells her that she is not his servant, but his slave.

In the revised version, the first summoning appears to be much the same, with the prose tightened somewhat, but the witch sees Someone departing who appears to match the description of Odin.  It does not matter much to her with whom she deals, provided she can avenge her son and other kindred.  When she summons Satan again, the genuine enemy of souls replies to her, but this time says, in addition to his other icy words, that she did not deal with him, but with another.  He also makes another chilling statement absent from the original version:  “Mortals never sell me their souls.  They throw them away.”

Whether or not one believes literally in the Christian God and the chief fallen angel, there is a warning in that.

As a literary matter, both versions work: Odin is also active and plotting in the novel, and could have helped the chain of events along by appearing to the witch in another’s guise; or the Devil could have given the witch evil counsel to assist her in doing his work.  I prefer the revised version, both because the writing is improved, and because the advice which the witch hears the first time, although directed to an evil purpose, is wise and poetic.  It seems more natural coming from the mouth of Odin, who is Machiavellian but not all bad, than from the mouth of Satan, who is.

8 comments:

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Nicholas!

Many thanks for writing this second part of your review of Anderson's THE BROKEN SWORD, which I repeatedly read with keen interest. Your discussion of the book has been useful in finally getting me to resolve the puzzlement over which Being Poul Anderson substituted for Another in the revised 1971 edition of the book. Yes, I agree
Anderson's revision of Chapters VI and XII of THE BROKEN SWORD made the story more chilling. Altho I have my doubts that anything TRULY good can be said of Odin!

Sean

S.M. Stirling said...

I think the quote is: "They -give- themselves to me."

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Mr. Stirling!

I checked Chapter XII of the revised version of THE BROKEN SWORD and this is what Satan said to the witch: "Mortals never sell me their souls. They give them away." Albeit no stress was placed on "give."

Sean

paulshackley2017@gmail.com said...

To all,
In James Blish's BLACK EASTER, the Goat (just below Satan in the infernal hierarchy) says (quoting from memory): "WE WILL DO WITHOUT THE ANTI-CHRIST. HE WAS NEVER NECESSARY. MEN HAVE ALWAYS LED THEMSELVES UNTO ME."
Paul.

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Paul!

And both Anderson and Blish were all TOO right! We never SELL our souls to Satan, we thrown them away like garbage.

Hmmm, to relieve this rather grim thought, we see Anderson inverting the cliched pact with Satan story in the amusingly sardonic "Pact." About the dangers to DEMONS of making pacts with humans.

Sean

paulshackley2017@gmail.com said...

All,
Neil Gaiman's Lucifer says (not an exact word for word quote): "I never made anyone do anything. They are responsible for themselves. They just don't want to face up to it."
Paul.

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Paul!

And Neil Gaiman's Lucifer was right! This is all standard Catholic teaching.

Sean

Nicholas D. Rosen said...

Kaor, Mr. Stirling,

I’ll bet you’re right about the quote; I didn’t and don’t have a copy of the revised edition at hand.

Best Regards,
Nicholas Rosen