Monday, 1 January 2024

Crossing A Threshold

Three continuing characters, Nicholas van Rijn, David Falkayn and Adzel, are distributed across seven of the eleven instalments collected in The Technic Civilization Saga, Volume I, The Van Rijn MethodHowever, these three characters do not co-appear in a single narrative until the second of the seven instalments collected in Volume II, David Falkayn: Star TraderAll three make their final appearances in the first of the six instalments collected in Volume III, Rise of the Terran EmpireWhether singly or together, these three characters  are featured in fourteen of the twenty-four instalments collected in Volumes I-III. Of the remaining ten instalments, three are pre-Polesotechnic League whereas five are post-League. Thus, these three (of seven) volumes in themselves present a future history series, i.e., a futuristic sf series covering a period longer than the lifetimes of any individual characters.

The very first Technic History instalment, "The Saturn Game," links the late twentieth century of the author, Poul Anderson, to the fictional future of the series.
 
"The fact is that thresholds exist throughout reality, and that things on their far sides are altogether different from things on their hither sides. The Chronos crossed more than an abyss, it crossed a threshold of human experience.
"-Francis L. Minamoto, Death Under Saturn: A Dissenting View (Apollo University Communications, Leyburg, Luna, 2057)"
-Poul Anderson, "The Saturn Game" IN Anderson, The Van Rijn Method (Riverdale, NY, December 2009), pp. 1-73 AT I, p. 1.

One threshold is between reality and fiction. The characters in this fictional narrative cross the threshold between single-level activity and role play, then go further into the role play than anyone has done before, crossing another threshold. 

A threshold with altogether different things on its hither and far sides is what the philosopher, Hegel, called the "specific quantum." Thus, a liquid becomes solid below its freezing point and gas above its boiling point. These two points are specific quanta where a quantitative increase or decrease suddenly becomes a qualitative transformation. Another example is the straw that broke the camel's back. The most significant qualitative difference is that between empirically detectable neural interactions and subjectively experienced mental states.

"The Saturn Game" links back to the mass entertainment of the twentieth century and shows a plausible, or at least possible, programme of Solar System exploration in the near future. We might imagine that this near future does not after all lead to the Technic History. However, it does contain one precursor of later developments, the Jerusalem Catholic Church. Everything connects although there is no direct connection between "The Saturn Game" and the very last Technic History instalment, "Starfog." Both stories are about the exploration of space but in different millennia and in different spiral arms of the galaxy. More thresholds have been crossed, the most important being from slower-than-light space travel to faster-than-light.

9 comments:

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Paul!

And I hope we live to see someone like Elon Musk using STL space travel to found that hoped for colony on Mars. That too would be the beginning of mankind crossing a decisive threshold, humans no longer being limited to living only on Earth!

Happy New Year! Sean

DaveShoup2MD said...


Sean - Given the closest historical examples, if a sustainable human settlement is founded on the Moon or Mars, safe bet it will be by some equivalent of the USAP, not by the "private" sector.

It's entirely possible some 21st Century equivalent of Sir William Paterson will induce some true believers, but we all know how that worked out ...

paulshackley2017@gmail.com said...

From Sean:

Kaor, Dave!

And I hope that will not be the case, due to my distrust of the State, any State, in such matters. The agonizingly long stagnation in what I would consider a real space program after 1973 was precisely because of gov'ts and sclerotic bureaucracies taking over. I far prefer Musk's testing to destruction approach to that taken by NASA, where everything has to work right from the get go. Musk's approach has been far more successful than NASA's!

Happy New Year! Sean

DaveShoup2MD said...


Well, it depends on the mission. In the sense (at the time, and today) of a national mission, NASA (and the DoD) have been much more successful than the private sector has ever been, or - based on the track record) will ever be.

Likewise, the contrast between the post-WW II era in Antarctic exploration and the "heroic age" is quite obvious.

Capitalists tend to only be brave individualists when they can socialize the costs, and privatize the profits. ;)

And when the manure hits the fan, the captains of industry always ask for the flag to save their bacon, so to speak.

There's a reason the USCG (and the CCG, and the RNLI, etc.) exists, after all; the NYSE (and its equivalent) will not cover the costs of ocean-going SAR, and never will.

There's probably a pretty good novella in a "private sector" mission into LEO or beyond going south and the PBI-equivalents of NASA, the NRO, DoD, etc. being called upon to save the day.

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Dave!

Then we cannot agree, because you are still missing the point. I do not have ordinary, run of the mill businessmen in mind. I am thinking of far rarer persons in mind, men who are willing and able to push beyond what it was possible to do. Musk did not have to go into space research and development, having made billions from his earlier businesses. Apparently to raise the funds he would need for what became SpaceX.

Any expedition Musk sends to Mars will obviously be beyond the reach of any quick help or rescue. So be it--men and women willing to be real adventurers and explorers will accept danger.

Ad astra! Sean

DaveShoup2MD said...


Sean - I don't see Musk as an Amundsen, or a Scott, however. ;)

And he does not strike me as the sort who would go down with the ship; more of a Ismay than a Smith, so to speak.

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Dave!

A better analogy might be comparing Musk to Prince Henry the Navigator. That Portuguese infante was a backer/supporter/financier of advances in ship designs, innovations, and explorations by Portuguese seamen.

Ad astra! Sean

Jim Baerg said...

Prince Henry seems more like evidence for Dave's position.
As a Prince, his explorations were government enterprises.

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Jim!

Yes, but Prince Henry was still a single person, however powerful and influential, who supported the advances I listed above, when he did not need to.

Ad astra! Sean