Tuesday 17 January 2023

Mice And Men

I am thinking about Lazarus Long in Robert Heinlein's Future History, Volume IV, Methuselah's Children, and about Hanno and his fellow immortals in Poul Anderson's The Boat Of A Million Years. These guys are un-aging mutants without benefit of any artificial antiagathics, antisenescence, antithanatics etc. If there are any such people in our world, then they wisely conceal their longevity from the rest of us as do the fictional characters. When Hanno reveals his nature to Cardinal Richelieu, the latter prudently/pragmatically judges that public knowledge of the existence of even one un-aging individual would further destabilize an already unstable civilization. When, during the general social liberation after the Second American Revolution, Heinlein's Howard Families go public about their longevity, they are persecuted. Social liberation is temporarily thrown into reverse until a way is found to rejuvenate people by putting artificial blood into their veins. Andrea tells me that there has recently been some research in this direction.

I did not blog this afternoon because I was visiting Andrea above the Old Pier Bookshop. However, conversation with Andrea usually discloses information relevant to this blog. He informed me that, with a single injection, scientists have reversed aging in mice and that human beings might be next. This is inherently a good thing but what might be its consequences in the current deteriorating world situation where even good news might be bad?

3 comments:

S.M. Stirling said...

Well, given that the world trend is for a population that is both aging and declining in absolute numbers, I don't think it would hurt.

If people didn't need to fear aging, birth-rates would probably drop even faster, fast enough to compensate for the massive drop in death-rates. If reproduction is something you can always do in the future -- not under a ticking clock -- people will be likely to put it off.

And off... and off...

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Paul and Mr. Stirling!

Paul: I looked up the link you gave and thought the research discussed in that article very intriguing. I don't think any of us here would object to a practical age reversing treatment restoring 50 to 75 % of what we were like 30 or fifty years ago. The big question being how long it would take for such a treatment to be practical and available.

Mr. Stirling: Good points. In fact, I think there may well be good reason for fearing population is declining too fast and too much.

Ad astra! Sean

Sean M. Brooks said...

I reread the ExtremeTech article about the Harvard Medical School's research in reversing the effects of aging in mice. It seems to me that the next step would be to repeat the experiments with chimpanzees. And if these give promising results then human volunteers over age 65 should be recruited for these experiments. After signing the usual consent forms of course!

Ad astra! Sean