Sf writers imagine alternative causes of consciousness.
"Stable plasma vortices...thought."
-Poul Anderson, "Kyrie" IN Anderson, Going For Infinity (New York, 2002), pp. 344-354 AT p. 347.
Each of these vortices is:
"...a form of ions, nuclei, and force-fields. It metabolize[s] electrons, nucleons, X rays..." (ibid.)
It maintains itself and thinks.
"'On the edge of the Coal Sack the McCrary fleet encountered a life form of a completely unprecedented nature: a stable, self-contained electromagnetic field, rather like Earthly ball lightning, capable of moving as freely through empty space as a bird flies in the air or a fish swims in the sea.'"
-James Blish, The Star Dwellers (London, 1979), 1. p. 17.
Anderson and Blish imagine conscious energy. Might some as yet undetected energy field help to explain human consciousness?
"'The personality is a semistable electromagnetic field; to remain integrated it requires the supplementary computing apparatus of a brain, as well as an energy source such as a body, or this case we live in, to keep it in its characteristic state of negative entropy. Once the field is set free by death, it loses all ability to compute and becomes subject to normal entropy losses. Hence, slowly but inevitably, it fades.'"
-James Blish, Midsummer Century (London, 1975), 3, p. 18.
In this account, brains do not cause but support consciousness. However, no such semistable electromagnetic fields have been detected and, even if they were, the mind-body problem, the question of how objectivity cause subjectivity, would remain.
We think that organisms with central nervous systems become conscious because brains cause consciousness. In Anderson's "Kyrie," stable plasma vortices cause consciousness/become conscious. In Blish's The Star Dwellers, stable, self-contained electromagnetic fields cause consciousness/become conscious. In Blish's Midsummer Century, a semistable electromagnetic field remains conscious as long as it is supported by a brain and an energy source. Thus, here are four objective phenomena:
our brains
Anderson's vortices
Blish's stable, self-contained electromagnetic fields
Blish's semistable electromagnetic fields
How does any of these empirically detectable, objectively existent entities cause subjective experience?
3 comments:
Kaor, Paul!
And there are gradations of consciousness as well. The cat hunting the bird does not consciously analyse the the problem of how to catch the bird. Seeing that bird brings up images in its mind meaning: BIRD! TASTY OR FUN TO CATCH. Then instinct or reflexes enables the cat to stalk and pounce.
A human observer watching the cat and bird can ponder more deeply, analyzing how the animals behave and even what it means.
Ad astra! Sean
Cats do need to -learn- how to hunt effectively.
They charge and pounce instinctively -- lion body language when doing that is strikingly similar to a house-cat's.
But they need parental guidance to refine the tactics to workable level.
That operates on lesser things too. One of my cats, while a kitten, was looking at an elder cat and quite deliberately imitated his posture, lying with front paws crossed.
Every cat we've had since has imitated this, but it's not "instinctive", it's learned.
Kaor, Mr. Stirling!
Gotcha. It's NOT all instinct, learning also plays a role.
Ad astra! Sean
Post a Comment