We unreflectingly think of an sf series like Poul Anderson's Captain Flandry stories as set in "the future" which, of course, it is but maybe the real situation is slightly more complicated? In the first place, we are, of course, fully aware that in no way is this our real future. No one can know whether the current Chaos will be followed by a Solar Commonwealth and a Breakup. Further, we seriously question whether some of the sf props and cliches, like faster than light interstellar spaceships, are even theoretically possible. Thus, any future history series already to some extent overlaps with that other fictional category, alternative history, even if the fictional history of the series has not yet quite overtly diverged from ours.
Secondly, no fictional narrative is set in either the past or the future as perceived by its viewpoint character(s). Everyone, whether Dominic Flandry or his readers, thinks of himself as living now, in the present. With no great stretch of the imagination, we can re-conceive Flandry's period as an alternative present. It could have been that if prehistoric events had occurred to a slightly quicker schedule by about a thousand years in a parallel universe maybe with slightly different physical laws allowing for quantum hyperspace.
In our universe, we know that, if we travel abroad, then we will encounter slightly different designs in architecture, household items etc. So imagine yourself now experiencing what Flandry does at the beginning of "Tiger By The Tail":
you wake in a metal cabin;
you can tell from background sounds that you are in a spaceship under hyperdrive;
the furnishings tell you that the crew is non-human but humanoid;
opening the door, you face a white-skinned, black-horned guard...
Imagine that that is our present.
6 comments:
Kaor, Paul!
True, when we read stories like "Tiger By The Tail," readers imaginatively think of themselves as being in the "present" of characters like Dominic Flandry. Even if we don't verbalize it like that, it's how we FEEL.
Ditto, what you said about fictional futures not going to be exactly what happens in the centuries to come.
And some scientists do think some kind of FTL might be theoretically possible, as in the Alcubierre warp drive. Making it practical and workable in the engineering sense is the hard part!
If we were actually living in a space faring "present" with FTL, we might be opening doors to meet non humans. Preferably in a much less menacing way than how Flandry first met Scothanians!
Finished Avi Loeb's EXTRATERRESTRIAL. I think he made a good case for arguing the 'Oumuamua "object" might have been an artificially built alien artifact. And that too many of his fellow scientists unimaginatively rejected that idea on insufficient grounds.
Next comes a serious rereading of Fleming's MOONRAKER. And I want to make another attempt at finding a copy of Stirling's DAGGERS IN DARKNESS this weekend. And I hope EXTRATERRESTRIALS IN THE CATHOLIC IMAGINATION comes next Monday or Tuesday.
Ad astra! Sean
Sean,
Can you remember whether Fleming referred to Peter Lorre in CASINO ROYALE and/or check whether he refers to him in MOONRAKER? I think that such a reference is in there somewhere.
Peter Lorre played Le Chiffre in the earliest screen adaptation of CASINO ROYALE.
Paul.
Kaor, Paul!
Alas, I don't recall any allusion to or mention of Peter Lorre from my recent reading of CASINO ROYALE. But I will watch out for him as I get serious about MOONRAKER. I do recall Bond being said to resemble Hoagy Carmichael.
One thing I read about CASINO was how publishers were at first unwilling to accept the book. It needed it's unexpected success to get people interesting in filming it.
And I will watch out for Peter Lorre in MOONRAKER.
Ad astra! Sean
I don't know where I got that Peter Lorre reference idea from but trying to find it gave me some interesting rereading.
Kaor, Paul!
But I put a piece of paper in my new copy of MOONRAKER, to use for marking the place if I find any references or allusions to Peter Lorre.
Ad astra! Sean
Kaor, Paul!
I've been mentioning EXTRATERRESTRIALS IN THE CATHOLIC IMAGINATION--but haven't we seen anything like EXTRATERRESTRIALS IN THE PROTESTANT IMAGINATION? Don't convinced Protestants, such as Baptists, Lutherans, Mennonites, Anglicans, etc., also have ideas, speculations, thoughts, etc., about the implications of intelligent life existing on other worlds?
Well, there was C.S. Lewis, a devout Anglican, writing an essay called "Religion and Rocketry." Much of most of which would not be objectionable to most Catholics.
Ad astra! Sean
Post a Comment