Maybe we need to take stock of where we are at in terms both of reading sf and of 100+ years of publication of sf or, as one of HG Wells' publishers called it, "Fantastic and Imaginative Romances."
In the 1960s, I read sf, including Poul Anderson, and confidently expected to live from the Present into the Future, which would begin in the twenty-first century if not sooner. I would not have been surprised by a Martian invasion. (I had read Wells' The War Of The Worlds although not yet Anderson's The War Of Two Worlds.)
There were four kinds of fictional futures:
(i) spaceships;
(ii) post-World War III survival;
(iii) natural disaster aftermath;
(iv) the day after tomorrow.
Anderson contributed to most categories. I remember (i) Dominic Flandry and (ii) Twilight World and read (iv) Brain Wave later.
The setting of a work in category (iv) is indistinguishable from that of a contemporary novel except that there is perhaps one technological innovation. If the narrative ends by explaining why we have not heard of this innovation yet, then the work can be set today instead of (what I call) "the day after tomorrow." The Time Machine never returns. The Cavorite sphere disappears. In Robert Heinlein's "Lifeline," the baronovitameter/chronovitameter is destroyed and its inventor murdered but the story is set in 1952 which was then the future. In CS Lewis' That Hideous Strength, the National Institute for Coordinated Experiments tries to take over Britain after the War, which was then the future. Brain Wave begins when it was published but then the world is transformed.
So where are we now on Earth Real? This post has been prompted by an editorial comment in a left wing newspaper published today:
"...the future is here.
"For decades people have been predicting that the blind process of capital accumulation would unleash terrible disasters. Now the Australian wildfires and the coronavirus pandemic show that the disasters have begun...
"Corvid-19 is probably an unintended consequence of intensive factory farming."
We have begun our own version of (iii).
12 comments:
Kaor, Paul!
Truth to say, I consider Anderson's THE WAR OF TWO WORLDS a better story than Wells' THE WAR OF THE WORLDS. But I agree Wells pioneered the sub-genre of alien invasion science fiction.
And I absolutely disagree with that, to be frank, ridiculous editorial statement you quoted. "Blind accumulation of capital," whatever the heck that means, did not cause the Australian wildfires and the coronavirus. For one thing, China, unfortunately, has an ANCIENT history of incubating diseases which then spread around the world.
Ad astra! Sean
Sean,
If you regard the editorial as fiction, then I think it makes a good culmination for the post!
Paul.
Kaor, Paul!
That is the most I could regard that editorial as being!
Ad astra! Sean
Sean,
Come off it! You can disagree with something without claiming not to understand it. "...the blind process of capital accumulation..." is corporate competition for profit at the expense of environmental damage. Wildfires are caused by global warming caused by use of fossil fuels. "Covid-19 is probably an unintended consequence of intensive factory farming...," which is global, not just Chinese.
Paul.
Kaor, Paul!
Respectfully, I still disagree. This "corporate competition" you seem to find so distasteful is anything BUT "blind." What it actually boils down to is farmers, entrepreneurs, businessmen and workers of all kinds finding old or new uses for resources that would other wise be useless. Farmers make rational calculations on which crops to grow based on estimates of their success or not. And it's the same with manufacturers of all kinds. They discover needs for new markets by offering new as well as products for sale. Bill Gates and Microsoft is merely a classic example of that!
As for fossil fuels, the only REALISTIC alternative to that is nuclear power. As long as far too many continue to "blindly" oppose nuclear energy, fossil fuels will NOT be given up. Untold millions of people in Africa, India,and China herself think of fossil fuels as the best way to lift themselves out of poverty.
I agree on the desirability of weaning ourselves off fossil fuels, but that realistically means adopting nuclear energy.
And Covid 19 started in China, which has a long history of incubating lethal diseases. I would need to chick, but I THINK measles, smallpox, the bubonic plague, to say nothing of a host of 'flus, all originated in China, spreading west and south via the usal trade routes. Ancient, not recent.
Ad astra! Sean
Sean,
But the businessmen do all that because they are motivated by the competitive accumulation of profit above all else. Needs remain unmet. Poverty not only continues but increases.
Paul.
Kaor, Paul!
And this is where we have to disagree. Farmers, businessmen, entrepreneurs of all kinds, etc., are FILLING needs AND lessening poverty. Compared to even 100 years ago, the most advanced nations are vastly more wealthy than they were at that time.
Ad astra! Sean
Sean,
My main point, however, is that you are now understanding and disagreeing whereas, in your first comment, you claimed not to understand what was meant, which I thought was a bit disingenuous!
Paul.
Kaor, Paul!
I agree. I was speaking too RHETORICALLY. For which I apologize.
Ad astra! Sean
Sean,
OK. Some communication! Blog communication is all the more welcome as life becomes more restricted by the virus crisis. One fear that I have is that something will stop this lap top working and I will not be able to get it fixed in a hurry. I say this now just in case contact is cut off abruptly.
Paul.
Kaor, Paul!
That is understood. I assume this means you don't have a tabletop computer?
Ad astra! Sean
No, just a lap top.
Post a Comment