The philosophical question in Poul Anderson's "The Barrier Moment" is: how do we know that the universe did not recently appear complete with false memories, records and evidence of a long past? If the question is unanswerable, is it meaningless? Does it matter? Would a time machine answer the question?
We, or at least I, forget many details so that an experience is remembered without most of its background. We know that many memories are constructed and can be erroneous. But surely some memories feel like direct acquaintance with past events? To remember is not to consult a set of records. I see something, then I remember seeing it. Will you, in a few moments, doubt whether your experience of this moment occurred?
Poul Anderson constructs a (very) short story out of this question but, of course, it does not really go anywhere. Some sf is like that: one idea in a few pages or less. Asimov has one where a drunk claims to be a time traveler who knows what killed the dinosaurs: the little ones with guns killed the big ones, then each other. And so on.
6 comments:
Kaor, Paul!
The philosophical question you gave here reminded me of the Muslim belief that God continually, arbitrarily, creates, or recreates the world from moment to moment. Does that the PASTS of those moments somehow did not exist till God artificially created those pasts? More simply, perhaps, "time" and men were creating those pasts from moment to moment.
Sean
Sean,
We might be re-created with different memories from moment to moment and never realize it.
Paul.
Kaor, Paul!
That seems logically possible even if I find the notion of being created/recreated from moment to moment distasteful.
Sean
I'm a Popperian, so this question doesn't bother me.
If a hypothesis is non-falsifiable -- if there's no possible way to demonstrate its falsehood if it is false -- then it's worse than wrong:
it's a semantic null set as far as I'm concerned.
So the question of whether the universe, with all its internal evidence, etc. was created a minute ago is literally precisely equivalent to "twas Brillig, and the Slythy Toves". I just mentally fill in nonsense syllables when I hear it.
Dear Mr. Stirling,
Ha, ha!!! That was amusing, and I do see your point. But many human beings ARE fascinated by such abstruse, if unanswerable questions.
Sean
Apparently Wittgenstein said that the unanswerable questions are the most important ones.
Paul.
Post a Comment