Monday, 4 February 2019

The Broken Sword, Original and Revised, Part One, by Nicholas David Rosen

I was at college in the first half of the 1980s when I found and bought a copy of THE BROKEN SWORD; it was the revised 1971 edition, with a preface by Poul Anderson, explaining how he had cleared the “wordbrush” and substituted one Person for another in a brief but important scene.  Elsewhere, Sandra Miesel expressed the view that the revised edition was an improvement, and wrote that subsequent quotations in her essay were from the revised edition.

I recently found a trade paperback of the original version on sale, with an introduction by Michael Dirda, and bought and read that.  The remainder of this post is directed primarily to Anderson fans who have read the book, but should also be of interest to book lovers who have not; while I will not recount the plot, those who do not want to learn anything about the events before reading the book had best cease to peruse this post.

The writing of the original version is less polished than the revision, and contains various typographical errors, although I do not know whether they were slavishly copied from the first printing, or newly introduced.  Plural possessives throughout the book use double quotation marks instead of single apostrophes.  “Monsters of the Wood of Grendel” should be “Monsters of the Brood of Grendel”, and a troll speaks of lying beside a human man, where “human may” (maiden) seems much more likely.

There are other changes which, in my view, improve the revised edition.  The revised edition describes Orm, at the grace-ale for his son Ketil, maintaining his cheer “as befitted a warrior who had contempt for death”, a memorable phrase lacking in the original.  In the revised edition, as I recall it, Imric describes his foster son Skafloc’s enthusiastically war-loving verses upon receiving his new steel weapons and armor as well said “if a little boyish.”  In the original, Imric’s words do not include this sound critical comment.

In both editions, milk from the infant Skafloc’s elfin wet-nurse Leea was sweet fire in his mouth and veins, but in the revised edition, “her milk” becomes “the milk which she brought forth by no natural means.”

Although the writing of the first version left room for improvement, in the author’s opinion, Sandra Miesel’s, and my own, the twenty-seven year old Poul Anderson accomplished more than telling a gripping, heroic, and tragic tale in a fully adequate prose style.  He wrote the book in several prose styles, using a spare, saga-like style for the opening tale of Orm, a lusher prose to describe Skafloc’s childhood and coming of age among the elves, and a style suggestive of a late medieval romance to describe Ketil’s being led astray and coming upon the witch in the guise of a beautiful young woman.  Anderson also composed a number of poems in alliterative verse (some rhymed as well) for the characters to recite in a variety of contexts and moods.  This would have been an impressive achievement for a writer of fully mature skill.

If you have not read the book, and are at all attracted to heroic fantasy of a grim Nordic sort, where heroes, villains, and bystanders are slain, and any women not dead themselves are left to grieve their heart-breaking losses, yet people dree their weirds bravely, with undaunted resolution, THE BROKEN SWORD is for you.  I prefer the revised edition, but either version provides a gripping tale and exceptional literary experience.

The Broken Sword, Original And Revised, Part Two, by Nicholas David Rosen

There is something more to be said about the differences between the two versions of THE BROKEN SWORD; saying this does not give away the whole story by any means, but it does hint at what will happen in the course of the tale, so those who have not read THE BROKEN SWORD and hope to do so may wish to refrain from reading further.

In the original version of the book, the witch summons Satan twice.  The first time, he advises her on how she can achieve revenge against her enemies (including the wife and children of the Viking chief who slaughtered her family and took their land).  The second time, a band of elves dispatched by Earl Imric are seeking her life, so she calls upon her master Satan to preserve her.  He refuses, calling himself the lord of evil, which is futility, and leaving her to be killed.  It is nothing to him whether she lives to see her revenge completed, and he tells her that she is not his servant, but his slave.

In the revised version, the first summoning appears to be much the same, with the prose tightened somewhat, but the witch sees Someone departing who appears to match the description of Odin.  It does not matter much to her with whom she deals, provided she can avenge her son and other kindred.  When she summons Satan again, the genuine enemy of souls replies to her, but this time says, in addition to his other icy words, that she did not deal with him, but with another.  He also makes another chilling statement absent from the original version:  “Mortals never sell me their souls.  They throw them away.”

Whether or not one believes literally in the Christian God and the chief fallen angel, there is a warning in that.

As a literary matter, both versions work: Odin is also active and plotting in the novel, and could have helped the chain of events along by appearing to the witch in another’s guise; or the Devil could have given the witch evil counsel to assist her in doing his work.  I prefer the revised version, both because the writing is improved, and because the advice which the witch hears the first time, although directed to an evil purpose, is wise and poetic.  It seems more natural coming from the mouth of Odin, who is Machiavellian but not all bad, than from the mouth of Satan, who is.

Kipling, Heinlein, Anderson And Gaiman

Both Heinlein and Gaiman quote Kipling:

"There are nine sixty ways of constructing tribal lays,
"And every single one of them is right!"

Heinlein presents this quotation in a SFWA Bulletin where he, Anderson and others discuss their future histories and where Anderson also both refers to Kipling and tells us that he modeled his first future history directly on Heinlein's.

Anderson quotes Kipling in his later Harvest of Stars future history.

Gaiman tells us that one of his Sandman stories was him "doing Kipling."

Addendum: The culminating novel of the Dominic Flandry period in Anderson's Technic History is a homage to Kipling's Kim. See the combox.

Sunday, 3 February 2019

Centers And Haze

Poul Anderson, Shield.

"Reddened by haze, the sun was dropping behind a Center, which bulked black against a sky where aircraft moved like glittering midges. The whole horizon was full of such unitized sub-cities and company towers." (I, p. 5)

"Skyscrapers and Centers reared above that hazy dusk, their heights still catching daylight." (II, p. 12)

"Since there was nothing above the house roofs here except some power lines, he could see the sky - red haze, no stars - and the beautiful, arrogant heights of a Center, half a mile or so away, looming over these mean walls." (III, p. 23)

"This must be a bomb-drop district, hastily rebuilt after the war and never improved since, except for the Centers; and they were towns to themselves, of course, where nobody could afford to live who didn't have the skills that an automation economy demanded." (111, pp. 23-24)

OK. I was wondering what "Centers" were but, by copying out enough quotations, I found out and also learned that "haze" was a subsidiary theme.

Future Paradoxes

Poul Anderson, Shield, III.

This novel shares with Anderson's first, Psychotechnic, future history the paradox of a high tech civilization following soon after a nuclear war. We recognize dystopian features of such a civilization:

upper- and lower-level social strata;
demoralizing technological unemployment;
population growth outpacing welfare services.

Upper-level society has company towers and aircars on multiple computer-controlled traffic levels. We have been here before. An experienced sf writer is able to sketch in a particular kind of future society in a few sentences.

Technology can educate and engage or alienate and antagonize. An sf novel either addresses such issues or merely presents a social background in which the issues are at least implicit.

The shield that protects our hero simultaneously immobilizes him so how useful a gadget is it?

An Apology For Absence

Posting on the Religion and Philosophy blog, visiting the monastery and rereading Julian May and Neil Gaiman have eaten into time that would otherwise have been used for posting on Poul Anderson Appreciation. I have just returned from the monastery and will probably post again this evening on that other blog. (I did, here.) My apologies.

My present Poul Anderson agenda is to continue rereading and posting about Shield. Meanwhile, there have been several interesting comments, including here the observation that Martians remained credible in sf until recently. We can still appreciate Martians in now dated sf by many authors and also in the recently introduced category of retro-sf, e.g., by SM Stirling. See here.

Saturday, 2 February 2019

Irony

Poul Anderson, Shield, III.

"And he must be something to see, Koskinen realized. Not only because he'd come down hard enough to smash concrete. But he was in good, new, upper-level clothes. On his back he carried a lumpy metal cylinder; the harness included a plastic panel across his chest, with switches, knobs, and three meters. Like some science fiction hero on the 3D." (p. 22)

Or like some superhero in a comic book? Or like the hero of an sf novel? But that third is what he is.

James Blish wrote that bad writers (which Anderson is not) sometimes try to deflect criticism by remarking that what is happening in their novel sounds like something in a bad novel - which it is.

In this passage, Anderson presents a striking image of a falling man in a high tech harness smashing concrete. But this is because he is protected by a Martian force shield. He is neither a flying man nor an invisible man but a shielded man. The novel will explore the implications of that premise.

Above The Future City

My attention has been elsewhere because I have become involved in a philosophical discussion on my Religion and Philosophy blog. See Human Immortality IV.

Meanwhile, in Poul Anderson's Shield, the megalopolis stretches from Boston, Massachusetts, to Norfolk, Virginia, and also to Pittsburgh and toward the Chicago complex. Visible above are:

"...sunset embers..."; (II, p. 12)
skyscrapers and Centers still reflecting daylight;
Venus;
relay satellites;
aircars on twenty traffic levels;
a trancontinental liner "...bound for Cape Cod seadrome." (ibid.)

There has been a nuclear war and there is now a Protectorate but also continued conflict with China.

Friday, 1 February 2019

Manse Everard's Moment Of Realization

I have posted about moments of realization in Poul Anderson's works but have overlooked perhaps the most dramatic.

Time Patrolman Manse Everard's Tyrian guide, Pum, has uncovered a crucial piece of military intelligence and sees that it is important to Everard:

"'My lord gathers his forces, I see,' murmured the boy after a while.
"The Patrolman nodded absently. His mind was in a storm of its own."
-Poul Anderson, "Ivory, And Apes, And Peacocks" IN Anderson, Time Patrol (Riverdale, NY, 2010), pp. 229-331 AT p. 317.

Everard is as yet oblivious of Pum's perceptiveness. However, after a while:

"'I think,' said Pum, 'my lord intends to do battle, in a strange realm where wizards are his foes.'
"Am I that transparent to him?"
-op. cit., p. 320.

Pum asks to follow him. Everard is astounded. But then:

"It's out of the question, of course.
"IS it? Everard stood thunderstruck."
-op. cit., p. 321.

That standing thunderstruck is the equivalent of all the other times that Anderson heroes have gasped, stiffened, gone rigid etc - realization.

Shield: Some Details

Poul Anderson, Shield, I.

Koskinen's shipmate, Dave Abrams, lives in "'...Centralia Condominium on Long Island...'" (p.6) where his mother serves "'...cheese blintzes.'" (ibid.)

Koskinen wonders whether to "...depple..." his beard. (p. 7)

The ship's captain had been called Twain. (ibid.) One of the two Military Security men who visit Koskinen is called Sawyer. (p. 8)

Koskinen is a free American citizen but American MS throws its weight about. Much sf, e.g.:

1984 by George Orwell;
"If This Goes On..." by Robert Heinlein;
They Shall Have Stars by James Blish;
this novel by Anderson -

- is a warning.