The Stars Are Also Fire,
12.
Anson Guthrie visits Edmond and Dagny Beynac who live comfortably on the Moon.
Guthrie:
"'My impression was the servant problem on Luna is so intractable nobody remembers what the word means.'" (p. 162)
The servant problem! In some societies, the affluent feel entitled to domestic servants and it is a "problem" if they cannot find them.
More fiction within the fiction: in his spare time, Edmond writes deep-space adventure stories under the pen name of Jacques Croquant although we are told neither titles nor plots. In that society, such works would not count as sf. (Some earlier sf described exploration of as yet unvisited parts of this planet whereas, in Edmond's time, the outer Solar System is being explored and there is a colony at Alpha Centauri. Deep space exploration is no longer sf.)
Two young Lunarians wrote the program that generated their artificial language but Dagny's daughter Verdea adds to its vocabulary. As part of their language, Lunarians change their names. Of the Beynac children:
Anson becomes Brandir;
Gabrielle becomes Verdea;
Sigurd becomes Kaino;
Francis becomes Temerir;
Helen becomes Fia;
Carla becomes Jinann.
Edmond calls Anson Guthrie one of the enlightened super-rich, "enlightened" because they keep scientific and technological progress alive. If there are super-rich at the social apex, then previously we would have expected to find sub-poor at the base. But the issues have changed. Now the "Low World" is:
"'...the vast majority, in every land, who can find no real place in this high-technology universe you have created...'" (p. 158)
What is so "enlightened" about creating a technology that super-enriches its owners while leaving no place for the vast majority? And will the kind of capital-labor relationships that had previously enabled a minority to accumulate wealth continue to operate when production has become cyber-automated? Fireball continues to operate as a company with employees but for how long?
War, this time in the form of a "Jihad," is coming on Earth as at the end of the interplanetary period in Anderson's Psychotechnic History. Guthrie expects the High World to win the war but to be changed. That is better than everyone being killed. This anti-Jihad War, like World Wars I and II, will change society but how? Surely the social division between a controlling ("super-rich") minority and a vast majority has to be recognized as redundant? A united humanity would be able to thank AI for stabilizing the Terrestrial environment but should otherwise retain collective control of its own social relationships and insist that from now on human and AI destinies peacefully parallel each other.
However, as this future history unfolds, human divisions enable AI to extend its control over both the natural and social environments and eventually to constrain human development.
3 comments:
If your time is worth, say, $50 an hour, and you can hire someone to do the laundry and such for, say, $15 an hour, then it's idiocy not to do so... and the person who gets the $15 is obviously needs it, or they wouldn't take the job.
There's nothing wrong with doing laundry for a living -- it beats the hell out of picking tobacco for 12 hours a day in the hot sun, or hauling obstreperous drunks out of a cheap bar(*).
Both of which I've done. Not because I particularly wanted to, but because I needed the money to eat; honest pay for honest work.
(*) bouncing is a lousy job not because of the violence, which was tolerable, but because about 50% of the time the drunks puke on you when you grab them around the waist. That denim jacket was never the same. I quit after 2 days because of that.
On the not-so-honest front, I was a drug dealer's bodyguard for one memorable weekend once -- in my own defense I had -no- idea of what he meant by asking me if I'd like to make a couple of hundred for helping him drive some stuff to New Jersey.
It wasn't until we parked in the alley behind the abandoned warehouse in Newark and he reached under the dashboard and handed me a shotgun and said "don't let anyone near the truck" that I twigged to what was really going on. At which point it was a little late to back out.
What can I say, I was young and stupid; that was in the 1970's.
Mr Stirling,
I have done lots of stupid things but you beat me with that one!
Paul.
Kaor, Mr. Stirling!
I agree with your comments about domestic service. And I recall Anderson having one of his characters in the stories collected as TALES OF THE FLYING MOUNTAINS defending the use of hiring a domestic staff by wealthy people.C And if technology advances so much that mass technological unemployment results, why not? It would be honest work for honest pay. And better than drinking away your days in despair on Citizens Credit, as we see in "Quixote and the Windmill."
Compared to you, I have led a very quiet, even secluded life! (Smiles)
Ad astra! Sean
Post a Comment