SM Stirling's several villains beat everyone else's for the sheer purity of their evil whereas Ian Fleming excels at the elaborateness of his villainous organizations and sometimes the upper echelons of such an organization are real people. We will consider examples from Fleming, John Sanders and Poul Anderson.
When James Bond fights Le Chiffre, the latter is assassinated by SMERSH which, at that time, is run by Beria. After Bond has defeated Mr Big of SMERSH, he is confronted by SMERSH's Chief Executioner, Donovan Grant, then by its Head of Operations, Rosa Klebb, but we, the readers, also see the Head of Planning, Kronsteen, and the overall Head, G, who receives a phone call from his superior, Serov. Thus, in SMERSH, there have been two historical figures. As a last gasp of SMERSH, Bond later defeats their treasurer, Goldfinger, whose name is famous although he is fictional. Later, Bond defeats Largo and Uhlmann of SPECTRE before confronting Blofeld twice. See also my ideas for Blofeld's Successors. (For the sake of simplicity, I have enumerated neither the other Russian intelligence chiefs with whom G confers nor the various criminal organizations represented in SPECTRE.)
In John Sanders' historical novels, the villainous organization, the Sealed Knot (a real organization) answers direct to the exiled Stuart (a real person) and that brings us to the reverse situation in Poul Anderson's A Midsummer Tempest, where Prince Rupert's antagonist, Sir Malachi Shelgrave, answers to:
"...a Roundhead officer, to judge from his bearing and russet coat: a strong-built person whose homely features grew mustache, chin-tuft, and warts." (xxi, p. 193)
The warts alone tell us that this is "'...General Cromwell...,'" (p. 194) who also appears in Alan Moore's Jerusalem.
8 comments:
Kaor, Paul!
I agree! Stirling excelled in creating both plausible and monstrously evil villains like Gwen Ingolfsson, Count Ignatieff, William Walker, Adrienne Breze, and Norman Arminger! Anderson's preference was to show that even men he firmly believed to have been wrong were not necessarily always evil. Such as the Ranger Brann in THE CORRIDORS OF TIME.
I know there are monstrously bad criminal organizations, such as drug traffickers and sex slave traffickers. Along with fanatical terrorists organizations trying to achieve political or religious ends. But, I don't find things like SPECTRE very convincing. Largely because it seems to have no MOTIVATION that could be used to justify the crimes Blofeld authorizes. Some kind of BELIEF would seem necessary to "strengthen" SPECTRE's agents in the teeth of efforts by powerful states like the UK or US to crush it.
Ad astra! Sean
Beria really was a very, very bad man -- not just ideologically ruthless, but a perverted rapist and sexual murderer who used his position as head of the NKVD to kidnap, rape and kill young women.
Stalin wasn't a pervert in that sense, but he was personally extremely cruel; parodies of prisoners begging for their lives were a staple of his dinner conversation. Hitler was much like him.
Himmler was just as ruthless a killer as Beria, but personally not a "man of blood" -- he hated the sight of it and found violence disgusting on an emotional level.
Kaor, Mr. Stirling!
I agree, the first three of these men were very nasty persons as persons. Not just ideologically ruthless a la Lenin.
Himmler SEEMS to have had some lingering qualms of conscience. Qualms he crushed. So he belonged to the ideologically ruthless category.
Ad astra! Sean
Himmler thought of killing as a distasteful necessity; but the people he had killed were just as dead.
We need a society where such people cannot gain any power:
"Some Cromwell guiltless of his country's blood..."
Kaor, Mr. Stirling and Paul!
Mr. Stirling: Exactly!
Paul: Not in the least likely to happen. As long as human beings are humans, the possibility of men like Lenin, Stalin, Beria, Hitler, Himmler, etc., rising to power or posts of great power will remain.
Ad astra! Sean
Sean,
We can certainly move towards making elected representatives more accountable and less able to use the state apparatus for their own ends.
Paul.
Kaor, Paul!
Which does NOTHING to prevent men like Lenin from either grabbing power by force or stopping Stalin from intriguing his way to supreme power. And so on.
Ad astra! Sean
Post a Comment