Poul Anderson, Genesis (New York, 2001), Part Two, I, pp. 102-103.
In Gaia And The Universe II, we compared emulations within Gaia to organisms within the universe. Now we can add:
minds within nodes (p. 102);
aspects within minds (p. 103).
First, let me summarize how I see consciousness within the universe:
reality is a single being, not homogeneous but internally differentiated;
being becomes conscious of itself;
thus, it becomes both a subject and an object of consciousness;
a subject of consciousness is a self;
however, self and other are interdependent like in-out, up-down, left-right etc;
thus, the one being becomes conscious of itself only by appearing to itself as other;
the processes that generate consciousness occur within organisms interacting with their environments;
therefore, a conscious organism becomes a "self" and its environment is "other" although the reality is that they are differentiations of a single being;
human beings can realize this unity, transcending alienation from the other;
thus, consciousness involves many selves within a single being;
however, since the single being is the subject and object of all consciousness, it is the one universal self transcending the many individual selves which are particular organisms;
the separate self is an illusion;
among human beings, each individual self can realize its identity with the universal self and can thus dispel the illusory separate self;
Buddhist "no soul" teaching is a denial of the separate self and Vedanta Brahman-Atman teaching is an identification of the individual self with the universal self.
And how that connects with Anderson's nodes, minds and aspects will have to be the subject-matter of a further post.
3 comments:
Kaor, Paul!
But I KNOW I am an individual being, a separate consciousness, not part of a universal self. The Sun is not self aware, nor does it KNOW it even exists. And the same applies to all other THINGS which are not PERSONS.
Sean
Sean,
I think that you are individual and unique, not separate. Absolute separation would be Hell. However, there is no agreed terminology in these matters, hence much confusion. I agree that things are not conscious. The cosmos has changed from unconscious to conscious only in certain organisms.
Paul.
Correction: absolute separation would be non-existence; the illusion of absolute separation would be Hell!
Post a Comment