Friday 4 March 2022

Future Cities

Roger Elwood also edited an anthology called Future City although that was not one to which Poul Anderson contributed. However, Anderson described many future metropolises. We notice two features of the built-up area where Svoboda's departmental tower is located.

First, even from here, nature is visible. Although the tower extends as far as he can see:

"...through airborne filth...past the floating docks, on the world's eastern edge, he could see the mercury gleam that was the open Atlantic.
"Dusk was creeping over the planet. Spires etched themselves black against the surly red remnants of sundown." (1, pp. 8-9)

Secondly, the social division between Lowlevel and upper-level exactly corresponds to the physical levels of the city's architecture:

"Highlevel walls and streets began to glow. Lowlevel was a darkness beneath, and a muted unending growl of belt-ways, generators, autofactories, sparks to show a window waking to life or a pedicar headlamp or the flashbeams of men going in cudgel-armed parties for fear of the Brotherhood." (p. 9)
 
This same social-physical hierarchy exists in the megalopolis of Niyorek in Anderson's The Corridors Of Time.

6 comments:

S.M. Stirling said...

That's Poul's version of dystopia.

S.M. Stirling said...

Though Niyorek in CORRIDORS turns out to be no more dystopic than the Rangers' ostensibly green and idyllic land.

paulshackley2017@gmail.com said...

Indeed.

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Mr. Stirling!

And I found myself liking Brann more than I did Storm Darroway.

Ad astra! Sean

Nicholas D. Rosen said...

Kaor, Sean!

I agree about Brann and Storm Darroway. Either might kill you or have your people overrun and made serfs in pursuit of what he or she saw as the greater good, and both of their societies have their ugly sides, but Brann seems personally no crueler than necessary. Also, while I want to preserve greenery in the world, I’m on the side of rationality and the Enlightenment as against pagans who practice human sacrifice. Speaking of which, the idea of Goddess worship being reborn after the twentieth century, and then, in tail-swallowing fashion, creating ancient pagan Magna Mater religions, seems more plausible now (at least the first part; I don’t believe in actual time travel) than when I first read CORRIDORS in 1978.

Best Regards,
Nicholas D. Rosen

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Nicholas!

Plus, I recalled Brann talking to a captive Malcolm Lockridge, in defense of his society, that it was at least scientific minded, aspired to space, and remembered things like the US Constitution. Also, mention was made of Brann's office having a Byzantine style icon on the wall. With both religious and artistic implications.

And I'm aware of the existence of "neo-paganism," which I consider too absurd to take seriously, intellectually or theologically. But serious problems does lie behind its rise, as discussed in a book I have called WICCA'S CHARM. Problems which needs to be addressed.

Best regards! Sean