One reason for reading or rereading a book is that we have seen its screen adaptation. I saw The Firm, then, the following day, found the second hand paperback and was intrigued to read about characters that I had just seen enacted by Tom Cruise and Gene Hackman, but the ending of the film was inauthentic.
If I saw any of Poul Anderson's characters on screen, then I would immediately reread the relevant book. Even very bad adaptations - which we do not want - might get people reading the books, then realizing how good they are. I have reread Stieg Larsson's novels while re-watching the two high-quality screen adaptations and am now rereading Garth Ennis' The Boys after seeing what I think is a very inauthentic TV dramatization. (I am trying to stop posting and get back to Ennis' graphic novel series.)
Imagine:
Star Wars fans see a high-budget Dominic Flandry feature film series, then start buying the newly re-issued books;
Flandry takes his deserved place as a modern myth.
2 comments:
From your mouth to Fate's ear!
Kaor, Paul and Mr. Stirling!
Both: I absolutely agree! And I wish someone in the film and TV worlds would get interested in the Dominic Flandry stories and push for making screened versions of them.
Paul: The examples I thought were Peter Jackson's LORD OF THE RINGS and HOBBIT movies. Despite how INAUTHENTIC they so often were to the actual stories, I hope the movies got some viewers interested enough in Tolkien's works to READ them. And finding out how much better they were compared to the filmed versions.
Ad astra! Sean
Post a Comment