Friday 3 September 2021

Eleven Future Historians

A future history can be about human beings interacting with each other, with alien intelligences or with artificial intelligences and always with their cosmic environment. Poul Anderson's nine future histories address all these options. They, together with his time travel narratives and cosmological sf, complete a substantial literary tradition. (My opinion, of course.)

In HG Wells's The Shape Of Things To Come, mankind remakes itself with science in the twenty first and twenty second centuries whereas, in CS Lewis's That Hideous Strength, the project of mankind remaking itself through science is revealed to be literally diabolical.

Olaf Stapledon's Last And First Men recounts the entire future history of mankind, including interactions with Martians and Venerians.

Stapledon's Star Maker recounts cosmic and creational history, summarizing Last And First Men in a single sentence.

In Brian Aldiss's Galaxies Like Grains Of Sand, evolution in our galaxy ends with man and, in the next galaxy, starts with man. (Non-Darwinian evolution, obviously.)

In A Short History Of The Future by RC Churchill, Orwell's, Huxley's, Bradbury's, Vonnegut's etc dystopias are shoehorned into a single narrative. (Huxley: Ape And Essence, not Brave New World.)

In Robert Heinlein's Future History, technological progress is accompanied by social regression although there is an eventual advance toward the first mature civilization. Martians, Venerians and other Solar races are present but peripheral even though the possibility of contact with non-human intelligences had been one of the Man Who Sold The Moon's many selling points.

Isaac Asimov connected his Robots series, about human-AI interactions, with his Foundation series, about a predictive science of society.

In James Blish's Cities In Flight, cities fly with anti-gravity while human beings live indefinitely with antiagathics but cannot survive the end of the universe.

In Blish's The Seedling Stars, as in Last And First Men, human beings are adapted to extraterrestrial environments.

In Blish's The Quincunx Of Time, messages from the future help to bring about an intergalactic utopia.

In Larry Niven's Known Space future history, human beings turn out to be mutated Pak breeder colonists of a former Slaver food planet and eventually become genetically lucky while meanwhile interacting with kzinti, Puppeteers etc. (Thus, we are not who we thought we were and we become someone else in any case.)

In Jerry Pournelle's CoDominium future history, mankind exports war and imperialism to the galaxy and encounters one alien race.

Poul Anderson's Psychotechnic History is about whether mankind can remake itself with a science of the psyche and society. There are some human-alien interactions.

Anderson's Technic History is both about the cycles of human civilizations and about many human-alien interactions.

Anderson's Maurai future history is about whether mankind can survive after nearly destroying its environment.

Anderson's Kith and Flying Mountains future histories are about mankind in space. In Starfarers, the Kith novel, time dilated space travelers interact with aliens while civilizations rise and fall on Earth.

In Anderson's Rustum future history, ideological conflict on Earth leads to extra-solar exile and colonization.

In Anderson's Directorate future history, as in his Rustum history, human beings colonize extra-solar planets despite traveling between planetary systems at only sub-light speeds.

Anderson's Harvest Of Stars future history and Genesis are about human-AI interactions.

I was reminded of Anderson's first, Psychotechnic, future history when, while rereading Harvest Of Stars, Volume II, I came across:

"...purely human politics, short-sighted, ignorant, superstitious, animally impassioned, forever repeated the same ghastly mistakes."
 
The revolt of the primitive against the unnatural state of civilization is the "protean enemy," opposed by psychotechnicians. 

11 comments:

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Paul!

I agree with this listing, albeit with some caveats here and there. And I can't really comment about writers most of whose works I have not read, esp. those of Stapledon and Blish. Plus, I disagree with your comment about Jerry Pournelle's Co-Dominium series, because I got the implication you thought it odd for him to show mankind "exporting" war and imperialism to the galaxy. I EXPECT humans to have wars and conflicts off Earth!

What really surprised me was how you did not include Stirling as a twelfth future historian with his four Draka* books, even tho they were set in an alternate timeline. Something like this: "Stirling's dystopian Draka history, about a subset of humanity exalting itself as the "Race," conquering Earth and the Solar System, and using genetic engineering to change humans into different master and slave sub-species."

Ad astra! Sean

Sean M. Brooks said...

Oops! I forgot to add a comment under that asterisk: "*MARCHING THROUGH GEORGIA, UNDER THE YOKE, THE STONE DOGS, and DRAKON."

Ad astra! Sean

paulshackley2017@gmail.com said...

Sean,

Yes, the Draka series does go into the future as does Emberverse. I am probably thinking of them more as "alternative" than as "future." Future histories involve at least the pretense that they present the future of the author's and readers' current timeline - until it becomes evident that they don't, of course.

Paul.

paulshackley2017@gmail.com said...

In fact, on further reflection, the Draka series presents alternative versions of World Wars I and II and is primarily an alternative history, not a future history.

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Paul!

I did have that in the back of my mind. But I would still argue for including some alternate universe future histories in lists like yours. Additionally, DRAKON shows us a New Race Draka cast into what looks very much like our timeline, circa AD 1998.*

Ad astra! Seab


*But Stirling warned us that if you at certain places in DRAKON, we would find indications the 1998 Earth of that timeline is not the same as ours.

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Paul!

You are right, we see alternate versions of WW I and WW II in the Draka series. And it was during that alternate Great War that the Draka declared their complete independence of the British Empire, severing the last lingering, tenuous ties with a reasonably decent culture.

Ad astra! Sean

S.M. Stirling said...

Future histories become, effectively, alternate histories as time passes. I just short-circuit the process.

And even if the 1998 of DRAKON had been ours (it wasn't), it would -become- an alternate history by the fact of Gwen arriving in it!

S.M. Stirling said...

Humans keep doing the same sort of things; but they're not "ghastly mistakes", they're just "what human beings do">

Trying to cure them, to "solve" the "problem" is utopianism, which rarely ends well.

Theese are the conditions of being human; the most you can do is manage them.

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Mr. Stirling!

I used to think the Earth of 1998 in DRAKON was ours, before Gwen Ingolfsson landed in it. But you did warn us that if we look in DRAKON, we would find hints showing it is not OUR Earth.

Yes, "future histories" inevitably become alternate universe histories as time passes.

Again, I agree. Some problems can only be managed, not solved. And, I would frankly prefer that managing be done for the benefit of my own country and civilization, not of our enemies, if that is the best we can do.

Ad astra! Sean

S.M. Stirling said...

Sean: I simply take it as natural that everyone, including the enemies of my blood, will be “on their own side”.

There’s something wrong with anyone who isn’t.

So it’s not a matter of Good and Bad, just Us and Them, nothing personal, BANG BANG YOU’RE DEAD.

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Mr. Stirling!

Your first comment: of course!

Not quite so sure of your second comment. Albeit, I find a LOT to morally object to in Islam and the cultures shaped by it. However, if China didn't NOW have such a thuggish and repulsive gov't, I would probably regard rivalry with a China with a regime like that of the new dynasty we see in OPERATION LUNA as regrettable but also with people I could probably personally get along with.

Your third comment: I agree, and that was how Dominic Flandry regarded most of his Merseian opponents, simply as individuals. Nothing personal but he would kill them if they got in the way of him trying to defend the Empire.

All that said, some things ARE nasty, such as the racial supremacism of the Merseian Roidhunate Flandry opposed. Or the truly appalling Draka of your Domination stories.

Ad astra! Sean