Back to time travel:
  Harry Harrison wrote a definitive historical circular causality novel,   The Technicolor Time Machine, but was less successful with Rebel In   Time. In
 the latter novel, our hero knows that the villain has traveled   back 
to a particular time in order to help the Confederates win the American 
  Civil War. Hero travels back to thwart villain. The method of time 
travel   used ensures that he arrives at the same place. (They are 
transmitted back   from a particular research establishment rather than 
traveling in a   vehicle.) Hero arranges to arrive a few hours after 
villain and then has to   find him. Why did he not arrive before him in 
order to apprehend him on   arrival?
It
   may be replied that this would have deprived the novel of the drama 
of   pursuit in a historical period but this is not the point. The 
method and   circumstances of time travel could have been adjusted to 
allow for this,   e.g., if it is not possible to be precise about 
arrival times, then the hero   might have to arrive a considerable time 
beforehand and hide elsewhere while   waiting. Then, circumstances could
 prevent him from returning to the arrival   point in time to catch the 
villain arriving. The point is that both the   author and the characters
 seem to confuse time travel with travel through   space or on the 
Earth’s surface. In familiar travel, if we depart after   someone else, 
then we arrive after him as well. It seems to be taken for   granted 
that this should also apply to time travel. That none of the people   
experimenting with time travel realizes this amounts almost to a logical
   contradiction in the novel.
-copied from The Logic of Time Travel: Part II.
Poul Anderson, of course, gets it right:
from 1973, Saunders has briefly visited 1953 and 1993;
however, small automatic time projectors, sent to 2073, have not returned (remember the Time Traveler's model Time Machine and the Time Patrol message capsules);
in the large time projector, Saunders and Hull travel a hundred years ahead minus the number of days since the first automatic was sent because they do not want any futurian to have removed it;
the automatics are not there so they must have started to return but failed en route;
returning in ten-year hops, the two chrononauts, so to call them (Wells wrote "The Chronic Argonauts"), find two weathered projectors in 2013;
so the projectors got back further, then stopped and aged;
fighting back against increasing resistance and energy drainage, the chrononauts take two hours to reach 2008, then deduce that they would need infinite energy to reach 1973.
Notice that, in their initial attempt to retrieve the automatics, they aimed for the automatics' arrival time, not for a date a few days later.  

3 comments:
Kaor, Paul!
I clicked the link to Levens Hall, very nice! And I'm glad it's still in private hands. What "great houses" the US has were mostly built during our Gilded Age of the later 19th century, and seems to have mostly passed out of the families of the original owners (probably due to taxes and high costs). Museums, rather than places actually LIVED in.
A trivial comment: If Person A leaves a place and is followed by Person B two days later, then B can still arrive at A's destination before his arrival by traveling more quickly. Thus it can be possible to sometimes arrive at a destination sooner than an earlier departing traveler.
Ad astra! Sean
Ad astra! Sean
Sean,
I should have specified traveling at the same speed.
Paul.
Kaor, Paul!
That would take care of the difficulty I raised.
Ad astra! Sean
Post a Comment