Tuesday, 30 January 2018

1960-2018

In the 1960s, I read, among many other things, contemporary thrillers by Ian Fleming and John le Carre and futuristic sf by Poul Anderson. Since then, the Cold War has become history and events have overtaken most near future speculations. However, writers of contemporary fiction can keep their current works contemporary and can also write retrospectives like le Carre's The Secret Pilgrim. Meanwhile, events cannot overtake fictions set further in the future and sf authors also write alternative histories like SM Stirling's Draka and Emberverse series.

Fleming died in 1964. Anderson continued writing new future histories until the beginning of the twenty first century. Le Carre, still writing, shows us what Fleming did not, his characters in their old age. SM Stirling is still writing...

5 comments:

paulshackley2017@gmail.com said...

Kaor, Paul!

Unfortunately, the collapse of the USSR and the end of the Cold War has not brought real peace to the world. We are still in that era of Chaos (to use a term from "The Saturn Game) which began in 1914. We still face threats from jihadist fanatic, a dangerous post Soviet Russia, an ambitious China, and rogue regimes like the Kims North Korea, etc. Some of these things, like jihadist Islam, were anticipated by Anderson in his later works.

Sean

paulshackley2017@gmail.com said...

Sean,
I think that there are major conflicts within our own (US and UK) societies, not just between us and others. An ambitious China is doing no more than competing - like many other armed nation-states and accumulations of capital.
Paul.

paulshackley2017@gmail.com said...

Kaor, Paul!

I agree with most of what you said. I do think you are sometimes a bit more optimistic than I think is realistic. I would feel more optimistic if only we had something REAL off this rock, such as bases and colonies on the Moon and Mars, O'Neill habitats, mining of the asteroid belt, etc.

Sean

S.M. Stirling said...

Incidentally, the Cold War shows that espionage and the related "black arts" - disinformation, sabotage, etc. -- are not as important as some people think they are.

The Soviets were always better at this stuff; it didn't help them in the end.

paulshackley2017@gmail.com said...

Dear Mr. Stirling,

I agree. Despite being better at espionage and the related "black arts," the Soviets still failed. I would say that was because Marxism is a hopeless and useless philosophy or ideology on which to base a great power.

Sean