"Ruori recognized Bispo Don Carlos Ermosillo, a high priest of that Esu Carito who seemed cognate with the Maurai Lesu Haristi." (p. 16)
A Maurai philosopher:
"Ruori recognized Bispo Don Carlos Ermosillo, a high priest of that Esu Carito who seemed cognate with the Maurai Lesu Haristi." (p. 16)
A Maurai philosopher:
(For the title of this post, see here.)
Scanning S' Anton from above through a telescope, Loklann plans the attack on the spot:
men from his ship, the Buffalo, will parachute onto the plaza in front of the temple (cathedral);
the Stormcloud men will attack a large nearby building that might be a chief's dwelling;
Coyote will attack what look like barracks and parade ground;
Witch of Heaven men will land on the docks, seize defense guns and the strange ship and join the attack on the barracks;
Fire Elk men will land inside the east gate and send a detachment to secure the south gate, thus preventing escape by civilians;
from the plaza, Loklann will send reinforcements where needed.
Having given these orders, he jumps over the rail.
If we cannot, for the time being, grind Poul Anderson's "Progress" into even finer particles, then we should turn to his first Maurai story, "The Sky People." I first read both "The Sky People" and "The Game of Glory" in Venture sf magazine, not yet suspecting that each of these stories was an installment of a different future history series.
As a rover fleet of the Sky People approaches and prepares to attack the Meycan city of S' Anton, Loklann sunna Holber, captain of the Buffalo, sees in the harbor a monstrous ship with seven tall masts and an unusual arrangement of sails. Although we do not know it yet, this is a ship of the Sea People called the Maurai and this series belongs to them, not to the Sky People.
We appreciate the descriptions of dawn light tinting cathedral spires rose and flashing off the gilt figureheads of the airships while regretting that the airships are about to raid the city.
First, I do not think that the policy suggested here would work but let's think about it.
Are politicians locked into power politics or might they give a lead in a different direction? It would make no sense to declare, "We will totally disarm and call on all other governments to do the same," but why not sign non-aggression pacts and agree to dismantle instruments of genocide and to divert those resources from destruction to life?
In "Progress," when the Maurai seize the Beneghali fusion plant, might they:
"'If your society can't handle something big and new like the tamed atom, why, by Oktai, you've proved your society isn't worth preserving.'" (p. 137)
So is that what we are supposed to think? Poul Anderson's characters usually do welcome newness. However, Anderson does not tell us what to think and certainly not in this case. The story ends with a question:
"'Our society can't handle something new?' she murmured. 'Oh, my dear Lorn, what do you think we were doing that day?'" (ibid.)
Handling the new by destroying it? I don't think so. But nor do I think that the reader is expected to give my answer. The question is left open.
Next, I will try to suggest what else might have been done.
Poul Anderson's Maurai have it both ways:
"'That's another lesson we've learned from history. The ancients could have saved themselves...'" (p. 136)
History and the ancients are us. This is a Maurai speaking. So how could we have saved ourselves?
"'...if they'd had the courage - been hard-hearted enough - to act before being snowballed. If the democracies had suppressed every aggressive dictatorship in its infancy; or if they had simply enforced their ideal of an armed world government at the time when they had the strength to do -...'" (ibid.)
I don't think so. How democratic are the democracies? Are they innocent of aggression? They have allied themselves with dictatorships. Would democracies retain their democracy if they suppressed and enforced?
Poul Anderson is right to use characters in futuristic sf to comment on the present. If we do not agree with this Maurai commentator, then what do we propose?
Another example of futuristic comment: in Alan Moore's V For Vendetta, set in Fascist Britain in 1997, one character has heard that the Leader is "absolutely barking." Another comments, "Remember all those things he said when he was Chief Constable." When this was written, it was a highly topical remark.
Sf is about the present.
(i) Many airships, each with a hundred-meter-long gas bag, control fins and propellers.
(ii) Centuries of forest management.
(iii) Trimarans with engines, propellers, automatic instruments, a computer and complicated sails.
(iv) Sunpower collectors.
(v) Radio.
(vi) Dielectric energy accumulators.
(vii) Fuel cells.
(viii) A hidden fusion plant - but the Maurai destroy it.
(ix) Catapulted jellied fish oil bombs.
(x) Streams of small sharp rocks fired from flywheel guns.
(Pirates do not have gunpowder so merchant ships avoid the expense.)
(xi) Rocket launchers.
(xii) A large observatory that photographs an ancient artificial satellite.
(xiii) A computer using artificial organic tissue.
(xiv) Surgically implanted miniature radios hooked into the nervous system, powered by body heat, simulating telepathy.
No space tech.
With nuclear fusion, the Brahmards would have been able to manufacture endless war materials and thus to displace the Maurai as the leading world power. If the Maurai had competed militarily using the same technology, then this would moved the world toward a Second War of Judgment. Even if the Maurai had not tried to develop nuclear power, others would have done so. Also, the missionary Brahmards would have tried to convert everyone else to their industrial-urban ideal whereas the Maurai have learned to value and protect cultural and technological diversity. A Maurai cites four historical examples of creative cultural interaction:
Egypt and Crete in the Eighteenth Dynasty;
Phoenicia, Persia and Greece in the classical period;
Nippon and Sara in the Nara period;
the current period when Maurai, Mericans, Okkaidans and Sberayks find different solutions to common problems.
OK. This is one reason why Poul Anderson could write historical fiction and future histories and I can't.
Surely nuclear fusion could have been kept and used for the common good? But Maurai psychodynamicists must have predicted that that would not happen.
In another of Anderson's fictional timelines, the Time Patrol suppresses a matter transmuter because of the harm that it could do. The Maurai and the Patrol have some things in common.
Brahmins were a hereditary priestly caste. Brahmards are a scientocratic elite, recruited young with psychological tests to weed out the insufficiently dedicated/fanatical. We must not stand in the way of progress.
The Brahmard symbol is Siva which they interpret as destruction leading to rebirth.
"'...they enjoy being a boss caste. But somebody has to be.'" (p. 106)
Does somebody? The speaker makes the point that:
"'No Hinjan country has the resources or the elbow room to govern itself as loosely as you Sea People do.'" (p. 106)
Maybe. But there are still collective choices to be made about forms of government.
The speaker is a Merican addressing a Maurai about Beneghal. In these few lines in this single short story, Poul Anderson makes us feel as if we have read a novel about these countries with their conditions and traditions. I am even more convinced than before that the Maurai History is accurately describable as a very condensed future history series.
The Brahmards want to return Beneghal, then the world, to where they were before the War of Judgment. The Maurai think that this will lead to another War of Judgment. Who is right? Anderson addresses real issues in fictional settings.
Orion Shall Rise has to be a work of fiction written by Poul Anderson and set in the Maurai History. The true story of how mankind gets back into space centuries after the War of Judgment is told in There Will Be Time.
Let me leave that thought with you all while I race out to eat with a former work colleague this evening. Sorry to be in such a rush. Hopefully more blog time soon.
High is heaven and holy.
Can consciousness be explained? Explanation is objective whereas consciousness is subjective. When neurons interact chemically, scientists can objectively observe the neurons and the chemicals connecting them. When neuronic interactions cause sensations, scientists can objectively observe the neuronic interactions but cannot observe either the sensations or any connection between neurons and sensations. If sensations were objectively observable, then they would not be subjective sensations.
It seems that scientists can explain how neurons affect each other but not how objective neurons cause subjective consciousness.
Today and tomorrow look like being busy so this might be the last post for a while.
Reading the Maurai short stories, we are plunged into a dense future history. Two hundred years before "Progress":
"After Armageddon the People of the Sea created a new kind of civilization, one based on the integrity of Life and the moral as well as pragmatic necessity of conservation. But the Sky People live by a different vision, and they have come to enforce it...."
This blurb, like the title, wrongly suggests that the Maurai and the Kith coexist and interact. In fact, the first Maurai story is entitled "The Sky People" and this title refers not to the Kith but to a group of sky pirates who will find common cause with the Maurai.
Titles and blurbs can mislead. In HG Wells's works, The War Of The Worlds and The War In The Air might have been two installments of a future wars series whereas, in fact, they are distinct and discrete narratives.
Poul Anderson's Maurai and Kith Histories are surprisingly similar in structure. Although three Maurai and two Kith stories were collected as Maurai And Kith, a third Kith story was written later. Each of the series is a short but genuine future history with installments set generations or centuries apart. In both cases, a novel not fully consistent with the short stories was added later although the Kith novel incorporates revised versions of the first and third stories of that series.
Uniquely, however, the Maurai History is linked to the time travel novel, There Will Be Time.
There Will Be Time, XII.
The War of Judgment destroys civilization in the Northern Hemisphere. A new Southern civilization develops biological technologies and opposes nuclear power. A twentieth century time traveler, Jack Havig, visits this Pacific Federation and describes it to his family doctor, Robert Anderson, who relays this future scenario as a fictional premise to his distant relative, Poul Anderson. This second Anderson names the Southern civilization the Maurai Federation and writes several stories about it. In one of these stories, the Maurai mount an undercover operation against a secret fusion generator. Havig later discovers that this in fact happens. However, Poul Anderson has changed names and other details and has:
"'...guessed wrong more often than right.'" (p. 129)
The stories never circulated widely and were soon forgotten. Havig comments on sf and its occasional lucky guesses. Much food for thought in the 2022 of our timeline.
There Will Be Time, XVI.
Descriptions of natural beauty are welcome in fiction. Descriptions of natural endings, showing the passage of time, are relevant and resonant in time travel fiction.
Poul Anderson describes "October country":
Havig and Leonce visit Robert Anderson:
There Will Be Time, XIV.
Havig and Leonce visit Robert Anderson. They do their best to cover their tracks so that their enemies, the Eyrie, do not learn of their association with him. A week after the visit, younger Havig phones Anderson and asks if there was any trouble on the visit. There was not.
Imagine: Havig phones and asks. Robert Anderson replies, "Yes. You and Leonce approached my front door and were both shot dead by Eyrie agents." In that case, the Havigs would stay away. But, in that case, Robert Anderson would reply, "You didn't visit." And, in that case, the Havigs would know to stay away.
Certain sequences of events are possible:
(i) Havig phones. Robert Anderson says that there was no trouble. The Havigs visit.
(ii) Havig phones. Robert Anderson says that they didn't visit. They stay away.
(iii) Havig phones. Robert Anderson says that they were shot dead. Wanting to commit suicide, they visit. (They won't do this! I am just trying to list what is logically possible.)
(iv) Havig phones. Robert Anderson, wanting the Havigs dead, says that there was no trouble. They visit and are shot dead. (Again, he won't do this! etc.)
Other sequences are impossible:
(v) Havig phones. Robert Anderson says, truthfully, that there was no trouble. They visit and are shot dead.
(vi) Havig phones. Robert Anderson says, truthfully, that they were shot dead. They stay away.
There Will Be Time.
Confusingly, Caleb Wallis time travels through the history of the Eyrie twice. Let us differentiate between "younger Wallis" and "older Wallis," although the dividing line will be indistinct.
There Will Be Time, XII-XIII.
A wire rope from a ring around his ankle to a staple in a wall holds Havig in a tower room. He cannot time travel while held in place. Time traveling from a few days earlier when the room was empty, Leonce arrives at night with a flashlight. By spending some days in the immediate future, she has already confirmed that Havig will escape and also has seemed not to have been involved in that escape. She cuts the wire with a hacksaw. He time travels to the following morning and pretends still to be attached to the wall until a guard gives him breakfast and departs. Then Havig returns to the previous night, arriving in the dark room before his slightly younger self has departed to morning. Holding hands to stay together, they time travel to a few nights earlier when the room was empty and the door unlocked. Then, still time traveling, they walk downstairs, across the courtyard and out of the castle, stopping to breathe only at night. (They could have passed through a locked door while time traveling.) They flee into the pre-Colombian past.
This is how to evade captors who can time travel to check when you escaped. Accepting that Havig has escaped, the Eyrie will not waste man-hours trying to recapture him.
In Poul Anderson's "Flight to Forever," the time projector goes to the end of the universe and beyond.
In Anderson's Tau Zero, a time dilated spaceship goes to the end of the universe and beyond.
I used to track ideas through sf works by different authors but it does not follow that earlier works directly influenced later works. James Blish did not know of Edmond Hamilton's Cities In The Air when he wrote Cities In Flight and incorporated a reference to Jonathon Swift's flying island only when he remembered it. John Christopher wrote that his Tripods Trilogy unconsciously plagiarized Wells' The War Of The Worlds.
However, Anderson directly modeled his Psychotechnic History on Robert Heinlein's Future History and his Operation Chaos was directly inspired by Heinlein's Magic, Inc. Sf authors develop alternative implications of each other's ideas.
Now imagine that time dilation happens not to a spaceship crew speeding through space but to an individual who remains stationary, seated or standing, on the Earth's surface. We are talking about HG Wells' Time Traveler and Poul Anderson's Jack Havig. These characters are called "time travelers" although mere time dilation does not qualify them for that description.
There are two differences between the accelerating astronauts and these "time travelers." First, the time travelers are not accelerating. If they did, then they would soon pass escape velocity and then rapidly leave Earth and even the Solar System. Secondly, the time travelers can reverse the direction of their dilation. They can experience not only 1901-2000 in a second but also 2000-1901 in a second. It is this reversal ability that makes them "time travelers." The Time Traveler enduring for a second while everything around him endures for a century or more is clearly living and moving much more slowly than anyone else and he acknowledges that the slowest snail passes him much too swiftly for him to see it. Why then does he claim to experience rapid motion and acceleration so that the Time Machine swings around and falls over when he halts it abruptly?
When the Eyrie men apprehend Jack Havig in Constantinople, his wife, Xenia, asks:
"'Who are they, Jon?...What do they want? Where is your saint?'" (p. 133)
Havig's "saint" was himself multi-locating to fight Eyrie men on a previous occasion. This time, two of them hold his arms so that he is unable to time travel. But Xenia's question shows the limits of her religion. She believes that saints can intervene. In Zen, Bodhisattvas are personifications of wisdom and compassion, not beings that can intervene to offer practical help. Meditation (maybe) helps us to cope with bad experiences but does not put us in touch with supernatural benefactors.
There Will Be Time, XI.
Beyond the period of the Maurai Federation:
Jack Havig says:
"'...we'd better take care to stay within the area of unknownness, which is where our freedom lies.'" (p. 114)
Fortunately, there is a lot of unknown. I have read that Godel demonstrated that omniscience is impossible. My argument to this conclusion is as follows:
When Havig recounts how circumstances thwarted his attempts to change the past, Robert Anderson asks:
And there is another factor, which Niffeneger also addresses. A time traveler can never be certain that he does inhabit a single immutable timeline. Maybe, if he tries to change another past event, then this time he will succeed and will therefore be unable to return to his preferred present. If he does not want to run any risk of this outcome, then he had better avoid meddling with the past: a one-man Time Patrol. However odd this sounds, none of it is logically inconsistent, which is all that should concern a philosopher.
We have wandered away from Poul Anderson's texts but that is the nature of sf. We follow ideas through several authors' works and will soon return to Anderson.
Multiple timelines means many four-dimensional space-time continua coexisting in parallel along a fifth dimension. A mutable timeline means a single continuum changing along a second temporal dimension. Let us suppose that we inhabit a single immutable timeline.
Should sf writers link their time travel to their future histories? Heinlein and Asimov did it badly. Anderson did not link his long Time Patrol series to his longer Technic History but did link his short Maurai History to his single novel, There Will Be Time. This works.
We know of:
Thus, of both men, it is true to say that they travel into the future but what a difference. Wells could not have proceeded directly to a plot as complex as Anderson's. Anderson could not have written as he did except on the basis of previous time travel fiction.
Both men are lost in time at the end of their respective narratives.
One of the Last Men inspires Olaf Stapledon to write Last And First Men although Stapledon believes that it is fiction.
Raven dreams the historical text that Wells publishes as The Shape Of Things To Come.
The outer narrator publishes the Time Traveler's summary of the future of mankind and life on Earth.
There Will Be Time, VII.
"North America, Europe, parts of Asia and South America, fewer parts of Africa, hit bottom because they were overextended. Let the industrial-agricultural-medical complexes they had built be paralyzed for the shortest whiles, and people would begin dying by millions. The scramble of survivors for survival would bring everything else down in wreck." (p. 75)
We have enjoyed sitting comfortably at home while reading about fictional heroes in danger of their lives and even about the deaths of millions in future catastrophes. Now I am persuaded that the paragraph quoted above might describe our immediate future.
Wallis tells Havig:
"'By now we've hundreds of agents, plus thousands of devoted commoners.'" (p. 76)
Does he mean temporal agents? That sounds like a lot after the difficulties he has had with recruitment. But we will read on and learn how big the Eyrie is.
There Will Be Time, VII.
Wallis contacted other time travelers in the nineteenth century by hiring agents to place ads which would attract attention from fellow mutants without using the phrase, "time traveler." Of course they did not use that phrase. The terms, "Time Machine," "time travelling" and "Time Traveller," were coined by HG Wells at the end of that century. I read parts of Mark Twain's turgid A Connecticut Yankee In King Arthur's Court if only to find out what terminology he had used: "transposition of epochs."
I would like to have read one of Wallis's ads and also to know how he had explained them to the young Englishman who wrote them for him. He chose someone late in the century to avoid "anticipations." We know that Wallis did share the time travel idea with this hired ad-writer. We also notice a similarity between their names.
"Time Patrol" opens with the ad that drew Manse Everard into the Time Patrol.
There Will Be Time, VI.