Soon to come on this blog: Nygel's review of "Time Patrol."
And on another blog: his review of the James Bond novels.
"Multilocation" is derived from "bilocation," which means being in two places at one time. The five timelines of the post title comprise:
3 Poul Anderson (prose);
1 Doctor Who (TV);
1 Alan Moore/Marvel Universe (graphic).
Poul Anderson, "The Nest"
"We stuck together, running out and firing. Twenty minutes later, each time we finished, we'd dart back to the Rover, jump it into the future, and return within one second and some feet of our last departure point. There were a good three hundred of us, all brought to the same time, approximately. And in a group like that, we had fire power. It was too much for the enemy...
"...twenty minutes after the last trip, our messed-up timelines straightened out, and the four of us were all there - victors."
-Poul Anderson, "The Nest" IN Anderson, Past Times (New York, 1984), pp. 71-111 AT pp. 109-110.
Poul Anderson, There Will Be Time
"The sportsmen [complained], after they jumped John Havig. They blubbered that he'd called an army to his aid. And beyond doubt, they had taken a systematic drubbing."
-Poul Anderson, There Will Be Time (New York, 1973), I, p. 15.
("...sportsmen..." is a euphemism for bullies.)
Poul Anderson, The Shield Of Time
"'[Everard] has repeatedly come to this lodge for rest and recreation, at various points of its existence, both downtime and uptime of the present moment. Why should we not call on these Everards also?...
"'...We will not do so. If we did, that would change reality again and again, hopelessly, beyond any possibility of comprehension, let alone control.'"
-Poul Anderson, The Shield Of Time (New York, 1991), 18,244 B. C., II, p. 301.
The timelines of "The Nest" and of There Will Be Time are immutable whereas the timeline of The Shield Of Time is mutable. "'...these Everards...'" were not called on. Therefore, to call on them would be to change events which the Time Patrol must not do, especially not on such an incomprehensible and uncontrollable scale.
Doctor Who
The Doctor periodically "regenerates"/changes actor and, for convenience, is referred to as successive "Doctors." The first five Doctors met. Thus, the Doctor quin-located. Mike, my daughter Aileen's partner, asked why the five Doctors could not travel together to the far future and remain then, never to return. My reply: if Doctor One does not return to the time at which he regenerated into Doctor Two, then there is no Doctor Two or any subsequent Doctor. That assumes a single continuous timeline, of course, but, anyone wanting to suggest alternative premises needs to state them clearly and consistently.
Alan Moore's Captain Britain
When a character multilocates, one of his multiple selves dies. The others know that that will be their death. (Subjectively: will be; objectively: was.)
When quoting from "The Nest," above, I skipped over these sentences:
"I hate to think about seventy-five of myself acting as targets at the same time, though. It would only have needed one bullet." (p. 110)
If there were seventy-five, then seventy-four had not been shot but the seventy-fifth might be.
Others
Robert Heinlein's Bob Wilson trilocates (see Circular Causality I) and there are other examples, of course.
3 comments:
Kaor, Paul!
And I look forward to reading Nygel's reviews!
I think I can kinda grasp how "multilocation" might work in an immutable timeline, as we see in "The Nest" and THERE WILL BE TIME.
While the Patrol might forbid Everard and its other agents from "meeting themselves," my thought was precisely that must have happened, if only by accidents, many times in its history. And we see the young hero of "Gibraltar Falls," in effect, doing precisely that in order to save the young lady. Shouldn't that alone have changed history?
Ad astra! Sean
Sean,
I should have quoted "Gibraltar Falls" as well. In that case, the multilocation is acceptable because it does not change events. His younger selves see his older selves. Events would be changed only if the time traveler appeared to a younger self who he knew had not seen an older self.
Paul.
Kaor, Paul!
And we see a neat solution to the problem of how the rescued lady, who supposedly died, did not in fact die, even tho she "disappeared" as regards the use of her original name.
Ad astra! Sean
Post a Comment