With limited time this evening, should I publish the 100th post for this month or rewatch The Girl Who Played With Fire? I am interested in the clever devices by which the makers of the films, having cut incidents from the plots of the novels, find different ways to bridge the resulting gaps. As a hypothetical example, suppose that someone filming Poul Anderson's A Knight Of Ghosts And Shadows had cut Flandry's visit to the planet Diomedes, where he learned of Aycharaych's part in the conspiracy, but then introduced an extended conversation between Flandry and Kossara while still in space that yielded the same information?
My answer is that this should not be necessary. I want to see any novel adapted to screen not as a two or even three hour "feature film" but as an extended serial, long enough to leave nothing out.
Now to watch the dvd.
1 comment:
Kaor, Paul!
Yes, I think a two or three filmed series would be needed to show A KNIGHT OF GHOSTS AND SHADOWS if nothing is going to be cut out.
I don't know if you have read any of Alexander Solzhenitsyn's historical novels--but his book AUGUST 1914 includes a chapter or chapter showing how he would have filmed a part of the disastrous Battle of Tannenberg--where the Russians were defeated by a smaller German army. The entire book is a deeply researched examination of the first weeks of WW I from a Russian perspective, showing us how Russians of all ranks, classes, occupations, etc., reacted to the war. From the anxieties and hesitations of Nicholas II down to the humblest peasant.
Ad astra! Sean
Post a Comment