The religious traditions present a series of fantastic reflections of real history:
one of the epic sources of the Pentateuch presented history as culminating in the Davidic monarchy;
however, history continued so various later prophecies were made, e.g., that not David but his descendant and successor would rule a universal kingdom;
Veleda prophesies the imminent overthrow of Rome by Germanic barbarians whereas Virgil/Anchises prophesies an eternal empire for Rome;
some might view the Virgilian prophecy as currently fulfilled spiritually instead of politically.
Poul Anderson does not show us Veleda's alternative history but does show us two alternative outcomes of the medieval church-state conflict.
We live in real history where, so far, no prophesies of Armageddon have been fulfilled. Indeed, empirically, history does not work that way. There is much conflict and unpredictability but all from purely human agencies.
3 comments:
"imperium sine fine" actually is a bit different from "eternal empire". It literally means "empire/authority without limits in time or space".
Omnipresent and eternal?
Kaor, Paul!
I believe the Suffering Servant oracles in Isaiah and the oracles in Jeremiah about a new covenant were meant to nudge the Jews away from a too "this worldly" conception of the Messiah. A conception fulfilled by Christ.
Ad astra! Sean
Post a Comment