In time travel fiction, Anderson's Time Patrol timecycles read like higher tech - and mass-produced - Time Machines whereas his ultimately evolved Danellians contrast sharply with Wells' devolved Morlocks and Eloi. I suggest that the Danellians encountered by Manse Everard during the twentieth century can be described as "extra-temporals," the time travel equivalents of extra-terrestrials. They originate from a later era (our descendants) rather than from another planet (no relations). And these "Danellians" - their name never explained - also contrast sharply with Stapledon's mentally time travelling Neptunians who, when exploring their past, are surprised to learn that their ancestors had migrated from Venus and, before that, from Earth. Comparisons of alternative speculations generate a sense of comprehensiveness.
Googling for images of Last And First Men, I was surprised to learn that this novel has recently been filmed.
7 comments:
Kaor, Paul!
A problem, however, is how different are the descriptions we get of the only times in the Time Patrol stories of the Danellians in "Time Patrol" and THE SHIELD OF TIME. The first encounter was terrifying to Manse Everard while the latter occasion shows a Danellian looking like a normal human.
These differences can be rationalized, as they have to be, but they still present a difficulty.
Ad astra! Sean
I'd say the second time the Danellian was deliberately 'toning down' their presence.
Kaor, Mr. Stirling!
I agree. Altho I have my doubts on how much human beings can or will change in a million years.
Ad astra! Sean
Sean: well, our line has changed rather considerably in the -last- million years. And genetic technology could speed that up rather considerably.
Kaor, Mr. Stirling!
That might be possible, I agree. And some of your stories have characters like the Draka using genetic technology.
Ad astra! Sean
Sean: a subtle point is that only certain types of person will approach human relations from a biological point of view.
Kaor, Mr. Stirling!
That is subtle and one I'm not sure I've properly grasped.
I also had in mind an article allegedly written by Poul Anderson that I might have quoted--except I'm not sure of its origins. I printed it our years ago, but the site I found it at gave no sources or dating for that article. So I've been reluctant to cite it--despite it making points relevant to this discussion.
Ad astra! Sean
Post a Comment