Tuesday, 5 March 2024

And James Blish

As an addendum to the previous post, James Blish comes between Heinlein and Anderson, both chronologically and conceptually, similar to Anderson but with a much smaller output. Blish is the only other sf author that I know of with more than one future history although fewer than Anderson. Anderson's future histories, to summarize not for the first time, cover:

a Heinleinian Time Chart
social change
post-nuclear Earth
asteroid colonization
extra-solar colonization
interstellar trade
human-AI interaction
post-human AI

- which makes them sound as if they could have been sections of a single series.

Blish's future histories cover:

flying cities
Adapted Men
Einstein's successor, Haertel, remembered in branching timelines

In one of those branching timelines, the novel, The Quincunx of Time, incorporates messages from future periods described in "A Style in Treason" and Midsummer Century, thus uniting these three works into a miniature future history. In Quincunx, an organization called the Service must protect future events just as Anderson's Patrol protects past events and Heinlein's temporal bureau operates in an immutable timeline with circular causality. These successors of Wells seem to encompass every possibility.

3 comments:

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Paul!

The Big Three of mid 20th science fiction is usually listed as Heinlein, Asimov, and Clark. The first two has been discussed often enough that we both pretty well agree on why RAH and Asimov do not satisfy us. But what of Clark? I think you seldom mention him. What is your opinion of his works?

Ad astra! Sean

paulshackley2017@gmail.com said...

Lters.

paulshackley2017@gmail.com said...

Laters.