Friday, 25 July 2025

Rip Van Winkle

 

I have just read Washington Irving's "Rip Van Winkle" for the first time in my life. We notice:

the kind of vivid description of the colours of nature that we on this blog appreciate in Poul Anderson's works;

that there is a whole narrative about Van Winkle as a person and about his home life of which we are unaware until we read the story;

that this story must surely count as precursor of later works about suspended animation or futureward time travel.

Some modern fictional characters have become myths. By this I mean that they are universally recognized even by those who have not read the original work. A second criterion might be that the essence of the character can be summarized in a single phrase, e.g.:

he is a great detective;
she entered a mad world through a rabbit hole;
he did not grow up;
he was raised by apes;
he slept for twenty years;
he fights crime dressed as a bat;
he is strong, flies and is "American pie";
he is an alien and logical;
he animated a corpse;
he drinks blood;
he made himself invisible;
he talks to animals.

Once, in a private correspondence, I listed over a hundred. How many sf characters are on this list? Some of Wells'. None of Poul Anderson's. Perhaps Nicholas van Rijn is widely known among sf readers by the description:

he is a flamboyant interstellar trader.

Successful films of Anderson's works would make van Rijn and other characters more widely known but the books have not yet had this effect although they definitely deserve to be more widely circulated.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Kaor, Paul!

I recognized all of these except the last one--I don't quite recall anyone who talked to animals.

Ad astra! Sean

paulshackley2017@gmail.com said...

Dr. Dolittle?

Anonymous said...

Kaor, Paul!

The Dr. Dolittle stories seem too "young" to become a cultural archetype.

Ad astra! Sean

paulshackley2017@gmail.com said...

But I have heard them referred to without having read them myself.

Anonymous said...

Kaor, Paul!

I can only say that is not familiar to me.

Ad astra! Sean

paulshackley2017@gmail.com said...

Sean,

Then Dr. Dolittle does not qualify for my list. He would have to be universally recognized.

Paul.

S.M. Stirling said...

BTW, I rather like Phil Farmer's take on Tarzan -- that the "mangani" who raised him were some sort of h. Erectus, ancestors of humans.

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Paul and Mr. Stirling!

Paul: That makes sense, I don't think Dr. Dolittle has that kind of "universality." Unlike Sherlock Holmes.

Mr. Stirling: And it would make it more plausible having a human infant being raised by "apes."

Ad astra! Sean