"Faster-than-light travel between humanly colonized extra-solar planets, possibly interacting with nonhuman civilizations" became an sf cliche in the twentieth century and cliches are bad even if some writers, particularly Poul Anderson, were able to do them good. Wells was pre-cliche. Some of Anderson's later works are post-, although interstellar travel, even if slower-than-light, remained a persistent theme.
Despite my appreciation of Anderson's Technic History, I am not drawn to read much more on this cliched interstellar sf theme by other authors. In Sharpe's Cafe, Lancaster, I picked up a copy of George R.R. Martin, Dying of the Light (SF Masterworks). The first page described a rogue planet and referred to "Earth Imperials" or a similar phrase. Familiar stuff.
One Christmas or birthday - they are only a week apart -, Aileen gave me Iain M. Bank's first three Culture novels: well-written and imaginative but not persuading me to read any more. The characters command vast wealth - but for trivial or destructive purposes? One novel revolved around complicated board games so I thought that we should have been told the rules of one of the games.
1 comment:
Kaor, Paul!
FTL or STL interstellar travel might be cliches, but they are things we should hope hope, aspire, or strive to attain. There is more to life than navel gazing contemplation or being satisfied with "moderate" prosperity.
And REAL human beings what they ACTUALLY are, flawed and imperfect, I fully expect great wealth, of the kind seen in a hypothetical post scarcity society (as in GENESIS or the HARVEST OF STARS books), to be used for either trivial or destructive purposes. The goal should be for SOME of that kind of possible wealth to be used constructively. In short, people will continue to be both foolish or wise.
Ad astra! Sean
Post a Comment