Saturday, 9 February 2013

More Ishtarian Superiority

See Fascinating Aliens.

In Poul Anderson's Fire Time (London, 1977) -

(i) " 'The Ishtarian on foot can travel faster than a man, including a man on a horse, and for much longer at a stretch without tiring. He can see quite well by night, so the shorter day is no inconvenience. He rarely needs shelter, and if need be he can live indefinitely off whatever herbage grows along his path. It's no particular bother to camp out on the job. In short, he's a better traveler than we are, with more speed and scope.' " (p. 112)

Ishtarians can travel faster and further because they are quadrupeds. I had thought that a future evolutionary stage might be a being with at least human intelligence but with a body at home in the natural environment, not requiring clothes, shelter or specially prepared food.

(ii) Because of their longevity:

"A bright young Ishtarian might study under a master, be in the prime of life when the catastrophes began, and survive to teach in the next cycle." (p. 117)

This personal continuity, together with storehouses of books and instruments, enable the Ishtarians to weather periodic catastrophes that would otherwise destroy civilisation completely.

(iii) "(Also there seemed to be the factor of creativity. If most men are at their most original between the ages of, say, twenty and thirty-five, the corresponding Ishtarian ages would be about fifty to one hundred fifty, with all the advantages of accumulating wisdom and insight.)" (p. 117)

One hundred years of creativity and learning as against fifteen! One Lawspeaker with "...an excellent memory and a gift for seeing the total picture..." had presided in the Gathering for three hundred years (p. 117).

(iv) "Ishtarians...have less innate violence, power hunger, and general irrationality than men..." (p. 118)

(v) " 'Ishtarians are better than us at producing and hearing sounds. Their music, like their dance, is nearly always incredibly sophisticated by our lights.' " (p. 124)

Despite all this, Anderson did not set out to describe a perfect or, in theological terms, an unFallen race:

"...they were equally able to see that robbery often yields more fun and profit than honest labor..." (p. 118)

Hence the need for the legions:

"The legions were the nearest thing to governed organizations [but] they were autonomous." (p. 118)

There is another small detail. The Lawspeaker observes:

" 'No doubt this assembly will stand for longer than expected...' " (pp. 120-121)

A quadrupedal assembly does not sit but stands.

4 comments:

Jim Baerg said...

"I had thought that a future evolutionary stage might be a being with at least human intelligence but with a body at home in the natural environment, not requiring clothes, shelter or specially prepared food."

On the African savannah the human body does not require (much in the way of) clothes or shelter. Though something to keep lions etc. away is a big help.
As for 'specially prepared food' my understanding is that cooking was a big help for allowing human intelligence, since it predigested some foods & allowed more calories to support the large brain with a more modestly sized digestive system.

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Jim!

I am not so sure savannahs anywhere on Earth would be that comfortable or safe for early hominis/humans. See Anderson's "The Little Monster." Life was all too Hobbesianly grim for the Pithecanthropines in that story!

Ad astra! Sean

Jim Baerg said...

The parts of the earth that consistently have temperatures comfortable for humans with no clothing often have predators capable of taking down a human, but that doesn't mean the body isn't at home in the environment.
The predators are probably a major reason human intelligence evolved. If we could defend ourselves with just a formidable body we wouldn't have needed much intelligence.

Sean M. Brooks said...

Kaor, Jim!

I agree that the need to solve PROBLEMS, like how to handle predators, must have been one of the factors encouraging intelligence in early hominins/humans. But before that intelligence was developed I'm sure it was very dangerous for people like the Pitecanthropines, no matter warm it was. Life was nasty, brutish, and short for most of them, to continue the Hobbesianism.

Ad astra! Sean