In "Interstellar Wealth" (April, '12), I meant merely to quote a few passages in which Anderson's readers vicariously enjoy the vast wealth, on an interstellar scale, of characters like Nicholas van Rijn. However, in The Game Of Empire, one character asks this serious question: with technology that could make every living being rich, why fight? In the concluding section of The Boat Of A Million Years, Anderson shows a society where everyone is rich by our standards but other problems arise. (See here.)
In "Starfog," Daven Laure, a Ranger of the Commonalty, says that economic planning is impossible for a continent, let alone a galactic spiral arm. In "The Commonalty" (April, '12), I agree with him about the spiral arm but not about the continent. He also claims that the people of the Commonalty do not get into wars. I think that this makes sense on their vast interstellar scale but, if Anderson had written more in this Technic History future history series, we might have seen otherwise.
Really ultimate questions emerge in the Harvest of Stars tetralogy and the novel Genesis:
human-AI interaction;
post-human AI (see "Organic and Post-Organic," April '12);
if humanity were extinct, would it be morally right for a higher intelligence to re-create living humanity with all its conflict and suffering?;
can intelligence survive the heat-death of the universe?
Those might be the most ultimate questions that we can think of as yet.
No comments:
Post a Comment