Sorry folks, I have got involved in an email discussion of human immortality with a professional philosopher which is a bit time-consuming. The question of survival after death is relevant to several works by Poul Anderson as is every other major issue.
Continuing to welcome new blog readers:
please see the previous post;
please also comment on blog posts;
so far, two blog readers have submitted articles for publication on the blog (see here) - others can;
please also check other blogs listed on the right hand side of the screen.
In The High Crusade, Anderson makes each stage of the medieval Englishmen's interstellar conquests seem plausible:
the Wersgorix home planet has a denser atmosphere so that Brother Parvus can easily hear their whispers in a terrestroid atmosphere;
the Wersgorix idea of a truce is based on expediency, not on any concepts of honor that a knight would be unwilling to break;
playing cautious, the Wersgorix hold back, giving the English time to gain instruction in the easy spaceship and weapons control systems from their prisoners;
the Wersgorix do not want to look incompetent by immediately informing the imperial capital of their initial setback;
in any case, interstellar communication is limited to light speed so that messages have to be sent in the FTL ships;
there are only three fortresses on this colony planet and the English have already captured one so it does not seem unrealistic to attack a second;
in any case, boldness is the only course open to them.
At what stage in the original reading did I begin to suspect that the English were going to win?
Kaor, Paul!
ReplyDeleteI agree, Poul Anderson manages to make the eventual victory of the medieval English of THE HIGH CRUSADE at least plausible. I do have some doubts they would win in a similar situation in the real world. It would depend so much on many different factors coming out just RIGHT.
Sean