Anderson informs us that:
"...Hal Clement's marvelously detailed and believable fictional worlds..."
-Poul Anderson, AFTERWORD IN Anderson, The Van Rijn Method (Riverdale, NY, December 2009), pp. 513-515 AT p. 513 -
- were one "wellspring" of this early novel.
This explains why Adzel studies at the Clement Institute of Planetology earlier in the Earth Book and on p. 187 of The Van Rijn Method.
Anderson's account of Clementian creation:
a star's age, chemistry, mass, luminosity etc
a planet in a given orbit
the length of its year
its irradiation level
its surface features
its kind of life
the evolution of that life
the odour of a flower
that odour's meaning to an individual
A Clementian paragraph in Anderson's text:
"This atmosphere carried the dust particles which are the nuclei of water condensation to a higher, hence colder altitude. Thus Diomedes had more clouds and precipitation of all kinds than Earth. On a clear night you saw fewer stars; on a foggy night you did not see at all."
-War Of The Wing-Men, XV, p. 103.
7 comments:
Kaor, Paul!
Absolutely, THE MAN WHO COUNTS is a very Clementian novel! I've read two of Hal Clement's books, MISSION OF GRAVITY and NEEDLE, with the former being one of the classics of SF.
Ad astra! Sean
Clement was good at planet-building, but bad at aliens.
Kaor, Mr. Stirling!
I have to agree Clement's aliens don't stand out to be as clear and distinct beings/persons. Not the way Anderson's Diomedeans, Alfzarians, or Merseians do.
Ad astra! Sean
Physically the Mesklinites make sense, psychologically they seem too much like humans.
Barlennan seems a bit like an alien Nicholas Van Rijn.
Kaor, Jim!
It was so long ago since I read MISSION OF GRAVITY that I don't remember much about the Mesklinites. And that may well illustrate how little Clement's aliens stuck with me.
Ad astra! Sean
Yeah, Clement's aliens were too human-like.
Kaor, Mr. Stirling!
And that's why I don't clearly recall Clement's non-humans: they did not stand out as aliens.
Ad astra! Sean
Post a Comment