"Perfect consistency is possible only to
God himself, and a close study of scripture will show that he doesn't always
make it." (1)
That was Poul Anderson's standard
response to readers who spotted inconsistencies in his future history. A lot of
inconsistencies in fiction can be ironed out if it is recognized that most
fiction, even when the narration is in the third person, is narrated from the
point of view of a fictitious character who may be mistaken. Merseians are
mammals but with more traces of reptilian ancestry than Terrans. Or they are
warm-blooded giving live birth but are not mammals, "...no kind of animal that
Terra had ever brought forth." (2) That last remark is obviously correct. The
statement that they are mammals is made from Flandry's point of view. The
statement that they are not is made from another character's. Thus, the
statements express different characters' understandings, not objective facts.
In A Circus Of Hells, Flandry
greets Tachwyr the Dark of Merseia as a member of the Vach Rueth whereas The
Game Of Empire presents Tachwyr as the Hand of the Vach Dathyr. We are to
understand that Tachwyr has risen to the Handship of his Vach between novels but
the Vach should not have changed. But, of course, Flandry could have been
mistaken. This would be out of character but is at least possible and A
Circus Of Hells does show him making youthful mistakes. Flustered at meeting
his former acquaintance unexpectedly in the formal setting of a Naval reception,
Flandry could have stumbled and misremembered Tachwyr's Vach, like introducing
someone as Northern Irish when we should have known that he was Scottish.
Alternatively, there is a Story To Be Told about why, against immemorial
Merseian custom, Tachwyr did for some reason change his Vach. Again, changes to
immemorial custom are at least possible. The only logical impossibility here is
Tachwyr both being in Vach Rueth and not being in Vach Rueth at the same time.
In "Honorable Enemies," Flandry says
that Chereionites have full citizenship in the Merseian Empire whereas
everything else that we know about Merseians entails that they either
subordinate or exterminate other races:
"... the highest end of all...absolute
freedom for our race to make of the galaxy what they will." (3)
That would seem to be incompatible with
granting members of other races equal citizenship. However, the Chereionites are
a very special case and, again, Flandry's information could be incorrect.
By referring to scripture, Anderson
unintentionally invited comparison between his History of Technic Civilization
and the Bible so how does Anderson's series measure up to this comparison? The
Bible, like the Technic History, is a history of a people. Its books cover
successive generations who lived in different but historically connected
periods. Some books present alternative versions of events. Individual stories
in Anderson's The Earth Book Of Stormgate and, in a separate volume, his
account of the founding of the Terran Empire are presented as possibly
fictionalized narratives of events that did occur. Further, some of Anderson's
characters seek theological significance in the course of events. Thus, I think
that the comparison with the Bible is valid.
No comments:
Post a Comment