Monday, 22 December 2025

Fiction About Science

Science fiction could mean fiction about science, i.e., about the work of scientists and about scientific processes. How much would we have to know about science in order to understand such a kind of fiction? Would the author be able to explain scientific issues clearly enough for the benefit of readers who were not scientifically educated and would he also be able to hold their attention throughout a narrative specifically about scientific questions and their resolutions? Scientifically uninformed readers tend to skip past the scientific rationales in works of sf but suppose the content of such rationales was present not only in a few introductory passages but also throughout a novel or short story, forming the main content of its narrative? James Blish put a lot of scientific background into They Shall Have Stars about the development both of antigravity and of antiagathics. I mention this because, among Poul Anderson's short stories, "Catalysis," which we have just read, and "Snowball," which we might be about to read, seem to fit into this proposed category of "science fiction." I could quote some dialogue from either story to illustrate this point. However, I would have little or no understanding of what I was quoting.

9 comments:

  1. Kaor, Paul!

    Because of the work of Hal Clement in stories such as MISSION OF GRAVITY, Anderson tried his hand at writing similar stories, as he did with THE MAN WHO COUNTS.

    Merry Christmas! Sean

    ReplyDelete
  2. Science fiction is -fiction-. It's (partly) about the consequences of advances in technology -- but the tech is bafflegab. Necessarily; if you really knew how to build it, you'd do that, not write about it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Kaor, Mr. Stirling!

    I agree, but Anderson wrote very good bafflegab, such as his explanation for how the FTL Technic hyperdrive worked in ENSIGN FLANDRY.

    Plus, he used real geometry for the ingenious plot twist we see in "The Three-Cornered Wheel."

    Merry Christmas! Sean

    ReplyDelete
  4. The first story in the "Tales of the Flying Mountains" collection is about the politics of financing scientific research.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Kaor, Jim!

    I remember that! The desperate bureaucrat heading NASA, facing a disgruntled Congress bent on terminating his agency, turned to a weird scientist dismissed as a crackpot by most to secure funding for NASA to survive a few more years. Unexpectedly, the crackpot's insights about gyrogravitics bore fruit in a practical invention, the "geegee."

    Pity we don't have gyrogravitics in the real world!

    Merry Christmas! Sean

    ReplyDelete
  6. Sean: well, reusable rockets are bringing down launch costs and will do so more. Gravitics is probably -possible- according to the latest research, but it will take a long time to come up with the tech.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Kaor, Mr. Stirling!

    Your first sentence, I remember that as well from "Nothing Succeeds Like Failure." The bureaucrat trying to save his rear end talked about how, even with just Apollo era tech, reuseable spaceships could have been built long before "Nothing Succeeds...", if the will had been there.

    That interests me, real world gravitics. I suppose it's too much to hope a real Emett might come along to hasten research/development.

    Merry Christmas! Sean

    ReplyDelete
  8. Sean: the theory needs to be thoroughly understood first -- that's usual with physics. It wasn't until the late 30's that fission was thoroughly understood. The consequences...

    ReplyDelete
  9. Kaor,. Mr. Stirling!

    Then I hope someone, crackpot or not, soon comes to a thorough theoretical understanding of gravitics.

    Enormous consequences flowed from that thorough understanding of fission.

    Merry Christmas! Sean

    ReplyDelete