Tuesday, 18 November 2025

Carl Farness And The Death Of Swanhild

"The Sorrow of Odin the Goth."

In 300:

Hathawulf and Solbern, sons of the late Tharasmund, will lead an attack on Ermanaric in revenge for their sister, Swanhild, whom Ermanaric had trampled to death by horses;

their mother, Ulrica, urges them on;

she scorns Alawin, son of Tharasmund's leman, Erelieva;

Alawin intends to accompany his half-brothers in the attack but their ancestor, the Wanderer, intervenes and forbids this.

In 1935, we learn that the Wanderer is Carl Farness of the Time Patrol.

In 1980, Farness tells Manse Everard that:

he, Farness, will travel to the fourth century to research the Ermanaric story;

the Gothic king called Jormunrek in the Volsungasaga and the Eddas was really Ermanaric;

in the different accounts, Jormunrek had Svanhild, daughter of Sigurd and Gudrun, trampled to death by horses;

Gudrun urged her sons, Hamther and Sorli, to kill Jormunrek in revenge for Svanhild;

their half-brother, Erp, offered to accompany them but they killed him;

Farness guesses that there was bad blood because Erp was the son of a concubine.

Slow down there, Farness. We, the readers, already know that you are going to experience some of what you are describing!

4 comments:

  1. Note something that's common outside the Christian sphere of influence: revenge is a moral obligation, not a guilty pleasure.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Kaor, Paul and Mr. Stirling!

    Paul: A big problem with polygamy has been how often there were rivalries between wives and concubines competing not only for their husband's favor but also to protect or advance the interests of their sons. The often-vicious intrigues seen at the court of the Ottoman sultans being a prime example of that.

    Mr. Stirling: But that desire for revenge is not something to be proud of, all too easily a desire for justice degenerates into open ended, out of control blood feuds and vendettas. Vengeance is mine, declares the Lord--and that is how it should be done, punishment left for God and the State.

    Ad astra! Sean

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sean: but the Goths don't really -have- a State, although they're gradually developing one. Even as late as the Old English period in England, you could chose between taking compensation for an injury and waging a blood feud over it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Kaor, Mr. Stirling!

    I agree, it took a long time for true States to both arise and gain enough power to monopolize the means of violence and more or less effectively control/penalize crime. Perhaps not till Henry II's reign in England.

    Ad astra! Sean

    ReplyDelete