Sometimes other reading generates interesting comparisons with Poul Anderson and sometimes it is just interesting. Having finished rereading Stieg Larsson's second novel, I should return to rereading Ian Fleming's first novel. For previous Bond-Flandry comparisons, see here.
Bond is introduced as both a gambler and an assassin whereas Flandry is neither. The back cover blurb of Baen Books' Young Flandry proclaims:
ENTER DOMINIC FLANDRY -
THE JAMES BOND OF SCIENCE FICTION
- whereas, as the book's compiler and also two blog correspondents have pointed out, the publishing histories show that Flandry preceded Bond by two years.
Flandry is a tragic figure who knows that the Empire he serves is dying whereas Bond lives in a period when, in the words of the Japanese Intelligence chief, Britain has not only lost a great Empire but thrown it away. The Jap refers disparaingly to:
"'...the pitiful ruins of a once great Power.'"
-Ian Fleming, You Only Live Twice (London, 1966), Chapter 8, p. 77.
This reminds us of:
"...the wreckage at the edge of the receding tide of empire." (See here.)
The difference is that the Terran Empire is still only receding.
Kaor, Paul!
ReplyDeleteAnd the thing to remember about Dominic Flandry and that bit you quoted from A CIRCUS OF HELLS is how, for a not inconsiderable time, he ARRESTED that "receding tide of empire." Both on the Irumclaw frontier of the Empire and elsewhere.
Sean