tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3538502828554372917.post8644120221938313282..comments2024-03-28T23:42:09.625+00:00Comments on Poul Anderson Appreciation: Principles Of The BlogKetlanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08588156788583883454noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3538502828554372917.post-88817986049953270572017-05-14T23:34:29.192+01:002017-05-14T23:34:29.192+01:00Kaor, Paul!
I agree with what you said about how ...Kaor, Paul!<br /><br />I agree with what you said about how VARIED are the works of Poul Anderson and how even a single work like A KNIGHT OF GHOSTS AND SHADOWS can have many aspects or touch on many issues. And thanks for the nice linking to my "Political Legitimacy" essay.<br /><br />And I agree as well with your point (iii). Besides writers like H.G. Wells and Olaf Stapledon, you have found the works of S.M. Stirling worthy of comparison to Anderson's works. And of being enjoyed in their own right. And I appreciate Stirling's allusions and references to PA.<br /><br />And I certainly don't object if sometimes you discuss works by Wells, Stapledon, Lewis, Tolkien, Stirling, or other writers. After all, parallels, aspects, allusions, etc., can often be found in these authors works linking them to those of Anderson's.<br /><br />Sean Sean M. Brookshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13973738112230622557noreply@blogger.com